Research article
Accuracy of advanced versus strictly conventional 12-lead ECG for detection and screening of coronary artery disease, left ventricular hypertrophy and left ventricular systolic dysfunction
-
* Corresponding author: Todd T Schlegel todd.t.schlegel@nasa.gov
1 Human Adaptation and Countermeasures Division, NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, USA
2 Department of Electrical Engineering, Arkansas Tech University, Russellville, AR, USA
3 Department of Engineering, Colorado State University, Pueblo, CO, USA
4 Institute of Physiology, School of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
5 Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA
6 Biostatistics, School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
7 Division of Cardiology, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX, USA
8 Heart and Lung Treatment and Transplant Center, Texas Heart Institute, Houston, TX, USA
9 Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, Thomas Memorial Hospital, Charleston, WV, USA
10 Instituto de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares, Universidad de los Andes, Mérida, Venezuela
11 Grupo de Ingenieria Biomedica, Universidad de Los Andes, Mérida, Venezuela
12 Department of Clinical Physiology, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders 2010, 10:28 doi:10.1186/1471-2261-10-28
Published: 16 June 2010Additional files
Additional file 1:
(Supplemental Table 1): Performance of Selected Individual Conventional and Advanced ECG Parameters in the Training Set.
Format: PDF Size: 135KB Download file
This file can be viewed with: Adobe Acrobat Reader
Additional file 2:
(Supplemental Table 2): Components and Coefficients of those Primary and Secondary A-ECG Logistic Scores generated from the Training Set that Performed Best in the Test Set.
Format: PDF Size: 68KB Download file
This file can be viewed with: Adobe Acrobat Reader