Peer Review reports
From: Consumption of Cisatracurium in different age groups, using a closed loop computer controlled system
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
17 Apr 2013 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
7 May 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - JENNIFER HUNTER |
25 Jun 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jean-marie Conil |
27 Jun 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mehmet Ozcan |
30 Oct 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Guolin Wang |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
30 Oct 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
30 Oct 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Guolin Wang |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
30 Oct 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
6 Nov 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - JENNIFER HUNTER |
19 Nov 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jean-marie Conil |
4 Dec 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mehmet Ozcan |
11 Jan 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Guolin Wang |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
11 Jan 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
7 Feb 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mehmet Ozcan |
12 Mar 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Guolin Wang |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
12 Mar 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
9 Apr 2014 | Editorially accepted | |
21 Apr 2014 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2253-14-29 |
You can find further information about peer review here.