|
SPT responses of apple cultivars relative to Golden Delicious (in %) for 4 experiments. |
|||||
| Cultivar |
Experimenta |
Average |
|||
|
|
|||||
| I |
II |
III |
IV |
||
|
|
|||||
| Priscilla |
30 |
30 |
|||
| Santana |
34 |
38 |
30 |
34 |
|
| Jonathan |
48 |
48 |
|||
| Ecolette |
39 |
62 |
51 |
||
| Prima |
61 |
61 |
|||
| Elstar |
67 |
52 |
60 |
||
| Fuji |
70 |
69 |
48 |
62 |
|
| Gala |
65 |
62 |
63 |
||
| Elize Roblos |
67 |
67 |
|||
| Bellida |
72 |
72 |
|||
| Fiesta |
67 |
99 |
83 |
||
| Delblush Tentation |
87 |
87 |
|||
| Pinova |
89 |
89 |
|||
| Golden Delicious |
100b |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
|
a Data for the first three experiments were derived from the original data from three experiments of Bolhaar et al. [9] on respectively cultivar screening, intra-cultivar variation and storage, of which we used only the data of patients with mild symptoms. The forth experiment came from a new cultivar screening experiment. b The underlying HEP values for Golden Delicious for the four experiments were respectively 0.54, 0.45, 0.63 and 0.69. | |||||
Gao et al. BMC Plant Biology 2008 8:116 doi:10.1186/1471-2229-8-116 |
|||||