Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Plant Biology and BioMed Central.

Open Access Research article

Plant breeding can be made more efficient by having fewer, better crosses

John R Witcombe1*, Sanjaya Gyawali25, Madhu Subedi36, Daljit S Virk1 and Krishna D Joshi4

Author Affiliations

1 Centre for Advanced Research in International Agricultural Development (CARIAD), Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd, United Kingdom

2 Local Initiatives for Biodiversity, Research and Development (LI-BIRD), P.O. Box 324, Pokhara, Nepal

3 LI-BIRD, P.O. Box 324, Pokhara, Nepal

4 CARIAD, Bangor University, c/o CIMMYT South Asia Regional Office, P.O. Box 5186, Kathmandu, Nepal

5 Present address: Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 107 Science Place, SK S7N0X2, Saskatoon, Canada

6 Present address: The James Hutton Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen, UK

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Plant Biology 2013, 13:22  doi:10.1186/1471-2229-13-22

Published: 7 February 2013

Abstract

Background

Crop yields have to increase to provide food security for the world’s growing population. To achieve these yield increases there will have to be a significant contribution from genetic gains made by conventional plant breeding. However, the breeding process is not efficient because crosses made between parental combinations that fail to produce useful varieties consume over 99% of the resources.

Results

We tested in a rice-breeding programme if its efficiency could be improved by using many fewer, but more judiciously chosen crosses than usual. In a 15-year programme in Nepal, with varietal testing also in India and Bangladesh, we made only six crosses that were stringently chosen on complementary parental performance. We evaluated their success by the adoption and official release of the varieties they produced. We then modelled optimum cross number using assumptions based on our experimental results.

Four of the six crosses succeeded. This was a fifty-fold improvement over breeding programmes that employ many crosses where only about one, or fewer, crosses in 200 succeed. Based on these results, we modelled the optimum number of crosses by assuming there would be a decline in the reliability of the breeder’s prediction of the value of each cross as more crosses were made (because there is progressively less information on the traits of the parents). Fewer-cross programmes were more likely to succeed and did so using fewer resources. Making more crosses reduced the overall probability of success of the breeding programme.

Conclusions

The efficiency of national and international breeding programmes would be increased by making fewer crosses among more carefully chosen parents. This would increase the number of higher yielding varieties that are delivered to farmers and hence help to improve food security.