Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Neuroscience and BioMed Central.

This article is part of the supplement: Seventeenth Annual Computational Neuroscience Meeting: CNS*2008

Open Access Poster presentation

Intrinsic current generated, omnidirectional phase precession and grid field scaling in toroidal attractor model of medial entorhinal path integration

Zaneta Navratilova*, Jean-Marc Fellous and Bruce L McNaughton

Author Affiliations

ARL Neural Systems, Memory and Aging, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85724, USA

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Neuroscience 2008, 9(Suppl 1):P21  doi:10.1186/1471-2202-9-S1-P21

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2202/9/S1/P21


Published:11 July 2008

© 2008 Navratilova et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Poster presentation

Understanding of how hippocampal circuits accomplish path integration was advanced with the discovery of 'grid cells' in medial entorhinal cortex (MEC) [1]. Grid cells express a rhomboidal grid of high activity spots in any environment, indicating that they are part of a system that integrates velocity and direction of motion to track relative location. McNaughton et al. [2] suggested that grid cell path integration is based on a connectivity matrix originally proposed by Samsonovich and McNaughton [3]. Cells are connected as a function of relative grid phase, forming a torus-shaped continuous attractor. A 'bump' of activity stabilizes by a cooperative interaction among 'neighboring' (in the connectivity sense) cells and can move around the torus in a manner consistent with the rat's motion, causing each cell to reactivate periodically. This motion may be provided by cells observed in MEC layer III that are conjunctive for head direction, linear velocity, and grid location [4].

Grid cells also exhibit theta phase precession, firing at late phases of the theta rhythm when the animal enters a grid node and successively earlier phases as the animal traverses the node [5]. One model for phase precession [6,7] is based on asymmetry in the intrinsic connections, which causes the network to 'look-ahead' of the rat during each theta cycle and then reset at the 'actual' location of the animal at the beginning of the next theta cycle as a result of external input. This model, however, is inadequate to account for omnidirectional phase precession in 2-D environments or for precession during path integration without external cues to reset the activity each cycle.

We propose a more parsimonious system-level model in which the 'look-ahead' is determined by the rate of activity of the conjunctive cells, which drives the bump forward, and the reset is determined by an intrinsic after-depolarization current whose time constant induces the bump to form slightly ahead of its initial location on the previous cycle. A 1-D version of this model was implemented using the NEURON simulator. The model generates phase precession in both possible directions of travel, with no external reset mechanism. As predicted, changing the time constant of the after-depolarization, in a manner consistent with the observed variation along the dorso-ventral axis of MEC [8] changes the grid scale accordingly.

References

  1. Hafting T, Fyhn M, Molden S, Moser MB, Moser EI: Microstructure of a spatial map in the entorhinal cortex.

    Nature 2005, 436:801-806. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  2. McNaughton BL, Battaglia FP, Jensen O, Moser EI, Moser MB: Path integration and the neural basis of the 'cognitive map'.

    Nat Rev Neurosci 2006, 7:663-678. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  3. Samsonovich A, McNaughton BL: Path integration and cognitive mapping in a continuous attractor neural network model.

    J Neurosci 1997, 17:5900-5920. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  4. Sargolini F, Fyhn M, Hafting T, McNaughton BL, Witter MP, Moser MB, Moser EI: Conjunctive representation of position, direction, and velocity in entorhinal cortex.

    Science 2006, 312:758-762. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  5. Hafting T, Fyhn M, Moser MB, Moser EI: Phase precession in entorhinal grid cells.

    , in press.

  6. Tsodyks MV, Skaggs WE, Sejnowski TJ, McNaughton BL: Population dynamics and theta rhythm phase precession of hippocampal place cell firing: a spiking neuron model.

    Hippocampus 1996, 6:271-280. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  7. Jensen O, Lisman JE: Hippocampal CA3 region predicts memory sequences: accounting for the phase precession of place cells.

    Learn Mem 1996, 3:279-287. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  8. Giocomo LM, Zilli EA, Fransén E, Hasselmo ME: Temporal frequency of subthreshold oscillations scales with entorhinal grid cell field spacing.

    Science 2007, 315:1719-1722. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL