Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Neuroscience and BioMed Central.

This article is part of the supplement: Seventeenth Annual Computational Neuroscience Meeting: CNS*2008

Open Access Poster presentation

Simulating mirror-neuron responses using a neural model for visual action recognition

Falk Fleischer1*, Antonino Casile1 and Martin A Giese12

Author Affiliations

1 Dept. of Cognitive Neurology, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University Clinic Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany

2 School of Psychology, University of Wales, Bangor, UK

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Neuroscience 2008, 9(Suppl 1):P112  doi:10.1186/1471-2202-9-S1-P112

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at:

Published:11 July 2008

© 2008 Fleischer et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Poster presentation

The visual recognition of goal-directed movements is crucial for the learning of actions, and possibly for the understanding of the intentions and goals of others. The discovery of mirror neurons has stimulated a vast amount of research investigating possible links between action perception and action execution [1,2]. However, it remains largely unknown what is the real extent of this putative visuo-motor interaction during visual perception of actions and which relevant computational functions are instead accomplished by possibly purely visual processing.

We present a neurophysiologically inspired model for the visual recognition of hand movements. It demonstrates that several experimentally shown properties of mirror neurons can be explained by the analysis of spatio-temporal visual features within a hierarchical neural system that reproduces fundamental properties of the visual pathway and premotor cortex. The model integrates several physiologically plausible computational mechanisms within a common architecture that is suitable for the recognition of grasping actions from real videos: (1) A hierarchical neural architecture that extracts 2D form features with subsequently increasing complexity and invariance to position along the hierarchy [3-5]. (2) Extraction of optimal features on different hierarchy levels by eliminating features which are not contributing to correct classification results. (3) Simple recurrent neural circuits for the realization of temporal sequence selectivity [6-8]. (4) A simple neural mechanism that combines the spatial information about goal object and its affordance and the information about the end effector and its movement. The model is validated with video sequences of both monkey and human grasping actions.

We show that simple well-established physiologically plausible mechanisms can account for important aspects of visual action recognition and experimental data of the mirror neuron system. Specifically, these results are independent of explicit 3D representations of objects and the action. Instead, it realizes predictions over time based on learned 2D pattern sequences arising in the visual input. Our results complements those of existing models [9] and motivates a more detailed analysis of the complementary contributions of visual pattern analysis and motor representations on the visual recognition of imitable actions.


Supported by DFG, the Volkswagenstiftung, and Hermann und Lilly Schilling Foundation.


  1. di Pellegrino G, Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Gallese V, Rizzolatti G: Understanding motor events: a neurophysiological study.

    Exp Brain Res 1992, 91:176-180. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  2. Rizzolatti G, Craighero L: The mirror-neuron system.

    Annu Rev Neurosci 2004, 27:169-192. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  3. Giese MA, Poggio T: Neural mechanisms for the recognition of biological movements.

    Nat Rev Neurosci 2003, 4:179-192. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  4. Riesenhuber M, Poggio T: Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex.

    Nat Neurosci 1999, 2:1019-1025. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  5. Serre T, Wolf L, Bileschi S, Riesenhuber M, Poggio T: Robust object recognition with cortex-like mechanisms.

    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 2007, 29:411-426. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  6. Xie X, Giese MA: Nonlinear dynamics of direction-selective recurrent neural media.

    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 2002, 65:051904. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  7. Zhang K: Representation of spatial orientation by the intrinsic dynamics of the head-direction cell ensemble: a theory.

    J Neurosci 1996, 16:2112-2126. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  8. Hopfield JJ, Brody CD: What is a moment? "Cortical" sensory integration over a brief interval.

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000, 97:13919-13924. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  9. Oztop E, Kawato M, Arbib M: Mirror neurons and imitation: a computationally guided review.

    Neural Netw 2006, 19:254-271. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL