Log on / register
Feedback | Support | My details
Open AccessHighly AccessResearch article

Amygdala and fusiform gyrus temporal dynamics: Responses to negative facial expressions

Jennifer C Britton1 email, Lisa M Shin1,2 email, Lisa Feldman Barrett1,3 email, Scott L Rauch1,4 email and Christopher I Wright1,5 email

1Psychiatric Neuroimaging Research Program and Martinos Biomedical Imaging Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

2Department of Psychology, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA

3Department of Psychology, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA

4Current: McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, USA

5Division of Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

author email corresponding author email

BMC Neuroscience 2008, 9:44doi:10.1186/1471-2202-9-44

Published: 12 May 2008

Abstract

Background

The amygdala habituates in response to repeated human facial expressions; however, it is unclear whether this brain region habituates to schematic faces (i.e., simple line drawings or caricatures of faces). Using an fMRI block design, 16 healthy participants passively viewed repeated presentations of schematic and human neutral and negative facial expressions. Percent signal changes within anatomic regions-of-interest (amygdala and fusiform gyrus) were calculated to examine the temporal dynamics of neural response and any response differences based on face type.

Results

The amygdala and fusiform gyrus had a within-run "U" response pattern of activity to facial expression blocks. The initial block within each run elicited the greatest activation (relative to baseline) and the final block elicited greater activation than the preceding block. No significant differences between schematic and human faces were detected in the amygdala or fusiform gyrus.

Conclusion

The "U" pattern of response in the amygdala and fusiform gyrus to facial expressions suggests an initial orienting, habituation, and activation recovery in these regions. Furthermore, this study is the first to directly compare brain responses to schematic and human facial expressions, and the similarity in brain responses suggest that schematic faces may be useful in studying amygdala activation.


© 1999-2008 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated