Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Neuroscience and BioMed Central.

This article is part of the supplement: Sixteenth Annual Computational Neuroscience Meeting: CNS*2007

Open Access Poster presentation

The representational capacity of cortical tissue

Tomer Fekete12*, David B Omer1, Itamar Pitowsky3 and Amiram Grinvald1

Author Affiliations

1 Dept. of Neurobiology, the Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel

2 The Interdisciplinary Center for Neural Computation, the Hebrew University, Jerusalem 91904, Israel

3 Dept. of Cognitive science, the Hebrew University, Jerusalem 91905, Israel

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Neuroscience 2007, 8(Suppl 2):P65  doi:10.1186/1471-2202-8-S2-P65


The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at:


Published:6 July 2007

© 2007 Fekete et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Poster presentation

The ability to make distinctions is one of the fundamental capacities underlying cognition, from perception through abstract (categorical) thought. The distinctions a cognitive system is capable of making, should be manifested in its neural activity. Given a set of distinctions, the natural question that arises is whether this imposes constraints on the activity spaces which could embed such a set. We hypothesize that an activity space can embed a given set of distinctions only if its structure corresponds in some sense to the set of distinctions (that is it does not cause collapse of distinctions or undue elaborations within domains or clusters). Thus, we reason that the homology of an activity space approximates the rough structure of the underlying set of distinctions that is realized by the system's activity. Therefore, we refer to the structure of a given activity space as its representational capacity.

Thus we hypothesize that there will be a disparity in representational capacity between different states of arousal (for example wakefulness as compared to sleep). In other words, that the structure of activity spaces becomes progressively more complex as arousal increases. To test this hypothesis we analyzed voltage sensitive dye imaging [1] data obtained from the primary visual cortex of behaving primates:

1) Instances of activity were registered at different states of vigilance (anesthesia/covered eyes/visual stimulation). We conjecture that what constitutes a state in terms of activity is similarity (invariance) in the structure of instances of activity. Thus, real (structure sensitive) functions could be utilized to classify activity according to state.

2) The level sets of the typical value corresponding to a state were calculated explicitly within a boundary of ε from the set of measurements

3) Finally, the persistent Betty numbers of such level sets, which give the rank of the corresponding homology groups, and the corresponding statistics were computed following [2-5].

Indeed, it was found that activity is an invariant of state – activity becomes less random, more regularly distributed in space and time, more correlated, and has typical distribution of spectral energy in specific spatial-temporal bands, as arousal increases. These phenomena are very robust and thus allow not only perfect classification of activity according to state, but also noticeable confidence margins. Moreover the representational capacity of the imaged cortical tissue increased with arousal – that is the structure of activity space tends to be more complex as arousal increases.

References

  1. Grinvald A, Hildesheim R: VSDI: A new era in functional imaging of cortical dynamics.

    Nat Rev Neurosci 2004, 5(11):874-85. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  2. Edelsbrunner H, Letscher D, Zomorodian A: Topological persistence and simplification.

    Discrete & Computational Geometry 2002, 28(4):511-533. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  3. Robbins V: Computational topology at multiple resolutions. In PhD Thesis. Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Colorado, Boulder; 2000. OpenURL

  4. Zomorodian A, Carlsson G: Computing persistent homology.

    20th ACM Symposium on Computational Geometry 2004. OpenURL

  5. Carlsson G, de Silva V: Topological estimation using witness complexes.

    Symposium on PointBased Graphics 2004. OpenURL