Table 1

ICF-ratio data
Groups ∆T2T1 ∆T2T1 ∆T3T1 ∆T3T1 ∆T3T2 ∆T3T2
Mean ICF-ratio t-value Mean ICF-ratio t-value Mean ICF-ratio t-value
difference ± SEM p-value difference ± SEM p-value difference ± SEM p-value
ATX + real-rTMS 0.451 ± 0.12 t(8) = 3.7 0.632 ± 0.13 t(8) = 4.8 0.181 ± 0.07 t(8) = 2.7
*0.006 *0.001 *0.025
PLC + real-rTMS -0.089 ± 0.11 t(8) = -0.8 0.221 ± 0.1 t(8) = 2.3 0.311 ± 0.1 t(8) = 3.2
0.425 0.052 *0.012
ATX + sham-rTMS 0.352 ± 0.12 t(8) = 2.97 0.354 ± 0.25 t(8) = 1.4 0.002 ± 0.19 t(8) = -0.01
*0.018 0.194 0.99
PLC + sham-rTMS -0.009 ± 0.07 t(8) = -0.1 0.163 ± 0.07 t(8) = 2.4 0.172 ± 0.12 t(8) = 1.5
0.9 0.043 0.17

Multiple paired two-sided post-hoc t-test of ICF-ratio data. Bonferroni-corrected p-value threshold (p = 0.025). *significant.

Sczesny-Kaiser et al.

Sczesny-Kaiser et al. BMC Neuroscience 2014 15:46   doi:10.1186/1471-2202-15-46

Open Data