Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Neuroscience and BioMed Central.

This article is part of the supplement: Abstracts from the Twenty Second Annual Computational Neuroscience Meeting: CNS*2013

Open Access Poster presentation

Controlling the Go / No-Go decision threshold in the striatum

Jyotika Bahuguna13*, Ad Aertsen12 and Arvind Kumar12

Author Affiliations

1 Bernstein Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg, 79104, Germany

2 Neurobiology and Biophysics, Faculty of Biology, University of Freiburg, 79104, Germany

3 Computational Biology, School of Computer Science and Communication, KTH-Stockholm, 10044, Sweden

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Neuroscience 2013, 14(Suppl 1):P228  doi:10.1186/1471-2202-14-S1-P228


The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2202/14/S1/P228


Published:8 July 2013

© 2013 Bahuguna et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Poster presentation

A typical Go/No-Go decision is thought to be implemented via the activation of direct and indirect pathways in the basal ganglia. Indeed, optogenetic activation of the direct pathway increased ambulation, whereas that of the indirect pathway induced freezing [1]. Striatal neurons participating in these two pathways express D1 and D2 type dopamine receptors [2]. Furthermore, D1 and D2 expressing MSNs also differ in their passive properties [2] and recurrent connectivity [3]. To understand striatal function it is, therefore, important to identify factors that regulate the balance of activity in D1 and D2 MSNs. Here we used both, a reduced firing rate model and numerical simulations of the striatal networks to study the dynamic balance of spiking activity in D1 and D2 MSNs.

Specifically, we show that: (i) Because D1 MSNs receive higher recurrent inhibition from FSIs [4] and D2 MSNs [3], they require a stronger cortical drive to overcome this inhibition. (ii) D1 and D2 firing rates change non-monotonically as a function of cortical input rates. For small cortical input rates, D1 MSNs have higher firing rates than D2 MSNs, due to the stronger synaptic input from cortex. For higher cortical input rates, D2 MSNs activity surpasses D1 MSN activity because cortical input rate is no longer sufficient to balance the strong inhibition coming from FSIs. The cortical rate at which D2 MSNs activity exceeds that of D1 MSNs is termed the decision threshold. (iii) The decision threshold depends on the strength of cortico-striatal synapses and the firing rate of FSIs. (iv) The STN could control the decision threshold via the massive pallidostriatal back-projections [5], via inhibition of the FSIs. (v) Finally, the difference between D1 and D2 firing rates is also modulated by the input correlations [6].

These observations help us to explain several experimental and behavioral findings involving the basal ganglia. The model suggest that under dopamine depletion conditions, even for weak cortical inputs, D2 MSNs activity is higher than D1 MSNs, which is consistent with the fact that Parkinson's disease (PD) patients have difficulty in initiating voluntary actions. We also observed that dopamine depletion reduced the parameter regime supporting D1 MSNs activation, by shifting the decision threshold towards lower cortical inputs. This suggests that under dopamine-depleted conditions, the striatum would require arbitration by the STN-GPe network, even for a low conflict task, providing a plausible explanation of increased reaction times in PD patients. Finally, increased activity in GPe under the influence of deep-brain stimulation (DBS) could also reduce the activity of FSIs on an average, thus shifting the decision threshold towards higher cortical input rates. Taken together, the model provides a mechanistic explanation of impulsive behavior in PD patients with DBS.

Acknowledgements

Supported by the Erasmus Mundus Joint Doctoral programme EuroSPIN, the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF 01GQ0420 to BCCN Freiburg and BMBF 01GW0730 Impulse Control) and the Cluster of Excellence BrainLinks-BrainTools funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG, grant number EXC 1086).

References

  1. Kravitz AV, Freeze BS, Parker PRL, Kay K, Thwin MT, Deisseroth K, Kreitzer AC: Regulation of parkinsonian motor behaviors by optogenetic control of basal ganglia circuitry.

    Nature 2010, 466:622-626. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  2. Gertler TS, Chan CS, Surmeier DJ: Dichotomous anatomical properties of adult medium spiny neurons.

    J Neurosci 2008, 28(43):10814-10824. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  3. Taverna S, Ilijic Ema, Surmeier DJ: Recurrent Collateral Connections of Medium Spiny Neurons are disrupted in Models of Parkinson's Disease.

    J Neurosci 2008, 28(21):5504-5512. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  4. Gittis AH, Nelson AB, Kreitzer AC: Distinct Roles of GABAergic interneurons in the regulation of striatal output pathways.

    J Neurosci 2010, 30(6):2223-2234. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  5. Mallet N, Micklem BR, Henny P, Brown MT, Williams C, Bolam JP, Nakamura KC, Magill PJ: Dichotomous organization of the External Globus Pallidus.

    Neuron 2012, 74(6):1075-1086. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  6. Yim MY, Aertsen A, Kumar A: Significance of input correlations in striatal function.

    PLoS Comput Biol 2011, 7(11):e1002254. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL