Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Neuroscience and BioMed Central.

Open Access Highly Accessed Research article

Inter- and intraobserver variability in motor mapping of the hotspot for the abductor policis brevis muscle

Nico Sollmann1, Theresa Hauck1, Thomas Obermüller1, Alexander Hapfelmeier2, Bernhard Meyer1, Florian Ringel1 and Sandro M Krieg1*

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, München, Germany

2 Institute of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Neuroscience 2013, 14:94  doi:10.1186/1471-2202-14-94

Published: 5 September 2013

Abstract

Background

For accuracy in navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS), determination of the hotspot location of small hand muscles is crucial because it is the basis for the resting motor threshold (RMT) and, therefore, its spatial resolution. We investigated intra- and interobserver differences of hotspot mapping to provide evidence for the reproducibility of this method.

Ten subjects underwent nTMS motor mapping of the hotspot for the abductor pollicis brevis muscle (APB) three times. The first two sessions were performed by the same examiner; the third mapping was performed by a different examiner. Distances between the first and second mappings (intraobserver variability) and between the second and third mappings (interobserver variability) were measured.

Results

Intraobserver variability had a mean of 8.1 ± 3.3 mm (limits of agreement (LOA) 1.7 to 14.6 mm), whereas mean interobserver variability was 10.3 ± 3.3 mm (LOA 3.8 to 16.7 mm). Concerning RMT, CCC was 0.725 (95% CI: 0.276; 0.914). The mean variability in the same cortical depth was measured as 5.7 ± 3.3 mm (LOA −0.7 to 12.2 mm) for intraobserver and 9.2 ± 3.3 mm (LOA 2.7 to 15.8 mm) for interobserver examinations. When evaluating the RMT, CCC was 0.709 (95% CI: 0.244; 0.909).

Conclusions

Overall, intraobserver variability showed higher reliability than interobserver variability. Our findings show that we can achieve good reliability in hotspot determination, ranging within the calculated precision of the system.

Keywords:
Cortical mapping; Transcranial magnetic stimulation; Motor mapping; Navigated brain stimulation; Motor threshold; Hand knob