Table 5

Third mapping
Subject No response Performance Hesitation Neologism Phonological Circumlocution Semantic Totals
Errors Rate Errors Rate Errors Rate Errors Rate Errors Rate Errors Rate Errors Rate Errors Trials Error rate
M1 31 0.08 40 0.10 46 0.12 11 0.03 2 0.01 0 0.00 1 0.00 131 384 0.34
M2 9 0.02 2 0.00 44 0.09 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.00 56 468 0.12
M3 30 0.07 6 0.01 66 0.15 3 0.01 1 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.00 107 441 0.24
M4 3 0.01 2 0.00 35 0.07 1 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 2 0.00 43 468 0.09
M5 2 0.00 2 0.00 21 0.05 5 0.01 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 30 450 0.07
F1 22 0.06 0 0.00 62 0.16 1 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 85 393 0.22
F2 19 0.05 0 0.00 62 0.15 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 81 420 0.19
F3 11 0.03 1 0.00 44 0.11 1 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 57 411 0.14
F4 9 0.02 2 0.00 42 0.09 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 53 477 0.11
F5 12 0.03 6 0.01 70 0.16 2 0.00 10 0.02 0 0.00 2 0.00 102 432 0.24
MIN 2 0.00 0 0.00 21 0.05 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 30 384 0.07
MAX 31 0.08 40 0.10 70 0.16 11 0.03 10 0.02 0 0.00 2 0.00 131 477 0.34
MEDIAN 11.5 0.03 2 0.00 45 0.12 1 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.5 0.00 69 436.5 0.17

Distribution of naming errors in the third mapping (second remapping): Summary of naming errors induced by rTMS per subject (M1-M5: male volunteers; F1-F5: female volunteers). Below is reported number of trials (rTMS trains), total number errors, and error type and rate of each given error type of all induced errors.

Sollmann et al.

Sollmann et al. BMC Neuroscience 2013 14:150   doi:10.1186/1471-2202-14-150

Open Data