Table 4

Second mapping
Subject No response Performance Hesitation Neologism Phonological Circumlocution Semantic Totals
Errors Rate Errors Rate Errors Rate Errors Rate Errors Rate Errors Rate Errors Rate Errors Trials Error rate
M1 17 0.05 34 0.10 41 0.12 4 0.01 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 96 345 0.28
M2 11 0.04 7 0.03 28 0.10 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 46 279 0.16
M3 25 0.07 29 0.08 50 0.14 4 0.01 0 0.00 0 0.00 4 0.01 112 348 0.32
M4 2 0.01 18 0.06 12 0.03 1 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.00 34 288 0.12
M5 7 0.02 32 0.11 15 0.05 3 0.01 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.00 58 288 0.20
F1 4 0.01 26 0.09 22 0.08 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.00 53 282 0.19
F2 10 0.03 18 0.06 43 0.14 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 71 303 0.23
F3 11 0.04 21 0.07 40 0.13 3 0.01 0 0.00 0 0.00 4 0.01 79 306 0.26
F4 13 0.04 42 0.14 27 0.09 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.00 83 297 0.28
F5 16 0.05 14 0.05 42 0.14 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.00 73 297 0.25
MIN 2 0.01 7 0.03 12 0.03 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 34 279 0.12
MAX 25 0.07 42 0.14 50 0.14 4 0.01 0 0.00 0 0.00 4 0.01 112 348 0.32
MEDIAN 11 0.04 23.5 0.08 34 0.11 0.5 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 1 0.00 72 297 0.24

Distribution of naming errors in the second mapping (first remapping): Summary of naming errors induced by rTMS per subject (M1-M5: male volunteers; F1-F5: female volunteers). Below is reported number of trials (rTMS trains), total number errors, and error type and rate of each given error type of all induced errors.

Sollmann et al.

Sollmann et al. BMC Neuroscience 2013 14:150   doi:10.1186/1471-2202-14-150

Open Data