Table 3

Average prediction rates with different numbers of training subjects
(12,12) (24,24) (32,32) (48,48) (60,60) (80,80) (100,100) Best performance
Sites {9,10} 67% 70% 73% 73% 77% 77% 85% 85%
Sites {3,9,10} 64% 68% 67% 74% 77% 79% 85% 85%
Site 9 68% 68% 73% 73% 75% 77% 85% 85%
Sites {3,10} 64% 69% 69% 72% 78% 80% 80% 80%
Site 10 64% 66% 69% 66% 67% 68% 80% 80%
Sites {3,9} 67% 67% 70% 76% 77% 77% 78% 78%
Site 3 57% 62% 63% 69% 72% 75% 78% 78%

Prediction using four combinations of site were reported and compared to the classification performance of each of the three selected sites separately. Sites are sorted based on best performances displayed in the last column (when best performance is similar, sites are sorted based on average performance).

Biurrun Manresa et al.

Biurrun Manresa et al. BMC Neuroscience 2013 14:110   doi:10.1186/1471-2202-14-110

Open Data