Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Neuroscience and BioMed Central.

This article is part of the supplement: Twenty First Annual Computational Neuroscience Meeting: CNS*2012

Open Access Open Badges Poster presentation

Synergetic role of inhibition and excitation in bursting synchronization

Igor Belykh

Author Affiliations

Department of Mathematics and Statistics and Neuroscience Institute, Georgia State University, 30 Pryor Street, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA

BMC Neuroscience 2012, 13(Suppl 1):P179  doi:10.1186/1471-2202-13-S1-P179

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at:

Published:16 July 2012

© 2012 Belykh; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Poster presentation

We study the influence of coupling strength and network topology on synchronization in strongly coupled networks of square-wave bursters with fast excitatory and inhibitory connections. Fast excitation is known to promote synchrony, which appears in purely excitatory networks of bursting neurons as long as the excitatory coupling exceeds a threshold value. On the contrary, fast strong inhibition leads to anti-phase or asynchronous bursting in purely inhibitory networks.

In this work, we report a surprising find that the addition of strong fast inhibitory connections to excitatory networks of square-wave bursters can promote synchrony. More precisely, the inhibitory connections, introduced to an excitatory network, can lower the synchronization threshold much more significantly than strengthening the present excitatory connections.

We use the stability methods, developed in [1,2], to explain this synergetic role of otherwise destabilizing inhibition in promoting stable synchronization of bursting neurons in excitatory networks. We demonstrate that there is a balance between the excitatory and inhibitory couplings providing the maximum stability of synchronization. These results are applicable to synchronization in a pair of mutually connected neurons as well as to large networks with mixed excitatory-inhibitory couplings. We also study the interplay between burst synchronization and the excitatory and inhibitory networks’ structures and show that the number of excitatory and inhibitory inputs each neuron receives is often the crucial quantity.


This work was supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant DMS-1009744 and the GSU Brains and Behavior program.


  1. Belykh I, de Lange E, Hasler M: Synchronization of bursting neurons: what matters in the network topology.

    Phys Rev Lett 2005, 94:188101. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  2. Belykh I, Hasler M: Mesoscale and clusters of synchrony in networks of bursting neurons.

    Chaos 2011, 21:016106. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL