Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Neuroscience and BioMed Central.

This article is part of the supplement: Twenty First Annual Computational Neuroscience Meeting: CNS*2012

Open Access Poster presentation

Bifurcation structure of adaptation versus depolarization block

Kun Qian*, Marco Antonio Huertas Chacon and Carmen Canavier

Author Affiliations

Neuroscience Center of Excellence, Louisiana State University Health Science Center, New Orleans, LA, USA

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Neuroscience 2012, 13(Suppl 1):P169  doi:10.1186/1471-2202-13-S1-P169


The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2202/13/S1/P169


Published:16 July 2012

© 2012 Qian et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Poster presentation

Midbrain dopamine neurons fire in a pacemaker-like fashion in vitro where they are deprived of most afferent input. In vivo, these neurons can emit a burst of action potentials with fast (~50 Hz) frequencies [1]. However, simple somatic depolarization of these neurons does not elicit such rapid firing because the neurons cease firing at levels of depolarizing somatic current injection stronger than those that elicit repetitive firing at about 10 Hz [2]. Here we argue that in the case of simple somatic current injection, firing ceases due to adaptation rather than depolarization block. We hypothesize that the primary adaptation mechanism is the slow inactivation of the fast sodium current [3], which causes the spike threshold to become more depolarized with each spike until spiking fails. We contrast the bifurcation structure of a simple 3 variable model that ceases to fire via this mechanism with a two variable model that fails by going into depolarization block. In both cases, spontaneous firing is characterized by an N shaped voltage nullcline with two stable branches. For the depolarization block, firing ceases when the fixed point moves from the unstable to the stable branch at the knee of the nullcline (Fig.1). The action potentials decrease in amplitude both at the peak and the trough, and the resulting stable potential is much more depolarized than the spike threshold for the adaptation case. In contrast, for the adaptation case, only the peaks of the action potential decrease slightly, and the final stable potential is at the spike threshold. As slow inactivation proceeds, the voltage nullcline loses the unstable middle branch, and the two stable branches merge. Spiking fails when the trajectory no longer crosses the unstable middle branch (the spike threshold) because the increasing ISI length allows for more fast inactivation. The two mechanisms can be differentiated experimentally: an additional depolarizing square pulse of current applied just after the last spike should evoke an additional action potential for adaptation, but not depolarization block.

thumbnailFigure 1. Spike Failure via Adaptation. (A) Time course of the membrane potential (top) and slow Na+ channel inactivation, middle), during spike failure after a depolarizing current step (bottom). (B) Phase plane for fast/slow analysis. The N shaped voltage nullcline (black curve) is calculated at a constant value of slow channel inactivation corresponding to spike failure (dashed line in panel (A)). The middle branch is the effective spike threshold. The red trajectory corresponding to the red waveform in the left two traces exceeds this threshold but not the blue one.

References

  1. Hyland BI, Reynolds JN, Hay J, Perk CG, Miller R: Firing modes of midbrain dopamine cells in the freely moving rat.

    Neuroscience 2002, 114(2):475-492. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  2. Richards CD, Shiroyama T, Kitai ST: Electrophysiological and immunocytochemical characterization of GABA and dopamine neurons in the substantia nigra of the rat.

    Neuroscience 1997, 80(2):545-57. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  3. Ding S, Wei W, Zhou FM: Molecular and functional differences in voltage-activated sodium currents between GABA projection neurons and dopamine neurons in the substantia nigra.

    J Neurophysiol 2011, 106(6):3019-34. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL