Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Neuroscience and BioMed Central.

This article is part of the supplement: Twenty First Annual Computational Neuroscience Meeting: CNS*2012

Open Access Poster presentation

Modeling realistic extracellular spiking activity in populations of neurons for the purpose of evaluating automatic spike-sorting algorithms

Espen Hagen1*, Torbjørn Bækø Ness1, Amir Khosrowshahi12, Felix Franke3 and Gaute T Einevoll1

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Mathematical Sciences and Technology, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, 1432 Ås, Norway

2 Redwood Center for Theoretical Neuroscience, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3198, USA

3 Bio Engineering Laboratory, ETH Zürich, CH-4058 Basel, Switzerland

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Neuroscience 2012, 13(Suppl 1):P143  doi:10.1186/1471-2202-13-S1-P143

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2202/13/S1/P143


Published:16 July 2012

© 2012 Hagen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Poster presentation

The emergence of silicon-based extracellular recording devices with large numbers of electrode contacts, such as multi-shank laminar electrodes or high-density multi-electrode arrays (MEA) now makes it possible to potentially record spiking activity from thousands of neurons simultaneously. With the concomitant increase in amounts and complexity of data, manual spike sorting is no longer an option, and there is a dire need for automatic spike-sorting methods. These methods must be able to correctly and efficiently resolve spikes of individual neurons from the recorded mixture, as discussed in a recent review [1].

For assessing the sorting quality, spike sorting methods should ideally be evaluated against test data with known ground truth, i.e., data for which the underlying spiking activity of each neuron in the recorded population is known. Unfortunately, such data sets cannot easily be acquired from experiments. One remedy is realistic, model-based simulations of extracellular recordings. Position-dependent spike shapes (Figure 1A) can straightforwardly be modeled in a biophysically realistic way by means of a recently released modeling tool, LFPy (compneuro.umb.no/LFPy), a Python implementation of a forward-modeling scheme [2] for extracellular potentials based on calculations of transmembrane currents in NEURON [3].

thumbnailFigure 1. A. Position-dependent extracellular spike shapes in vicinity of a cat L5 pyramidal neuron, obtained using LFPy. B. Schematic of the evaluation of spike-sorting methods against ground-truth test data for a population of hippocampal pyramidal neurons.

Test data for arbitrary electrode geometries, model neurons, noise levels and synchronicity levels can be produced at wish. Here we present example results relevant for tetrode and polytrode recordings in cortex and hippocampus. We also present test data for situations where prominent electrical boundary-condition effects significantly modify the recorded potentials, and FEM modeling must be used to solve the electrostatic problem. This is of particular relevance for cell cultures or retinal slices placed on high density MEAs.

An algorithm evaluation website has been set up on http://www.g-node.org/spike webcite to facilitate use of such benchmark data to evaluate the performance of spike sorting algorithms, as outlined in Figure 1B.

Acknowledgements

This work is supported through the Norwegian Research Council (NevroNor, eScience, Notur) and INCF through its German Node.

References

  1. Einevoll GT, Franke F, Hagen E, Pouzat C, Harris KD: Towards reliable spike-train recordings from thousands of neurons with multielectrodes.

    Curr Opin Neurobiol 2011, 22:1-7. OpenURL

  2. Holt GR, Koch C: Electrical interactions via the extracellular potential near cell bodies.

    J Comp Neurosci 1999, 6:169-184. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  3. Hines ML, Davison AP, Muller E: Neuron and Python.

    Front Neuroinformatics 2009, 3:1-12. OpenURL