Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Neuroscience and BioMed Central.

This article is part of the supplement: Twentieth Annual Computational Neuroscience Meeting: CNS*2011

Open Access Open Badges Poster presentation

Signal propagation and neuronal avalanches analysis in networks of formal neurons

Mauricio Girardi-Schappo1*, Marcelo HR Tragtenberg1 and Osame Kinouchi2

Author Affiliations

1 Departamento de Física, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, 88040-970, Brazil

2 Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Neuroscience 2011, 12(Suppl 1):P172  doi:10.1186/1471-2202-12-S1-P172

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at:

Published:18 July 2011

© 2011 Girardi-Schappo et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Poster presentation

To study neurons with computational tools, one may call upon, at least, two different approaches: (i) Hodgkin-Huxley like neurons [1] (i.e. biological neurons) and (ii) formal neurons (e.g. Hindmarsh-Rose (HR) model [2], Kinouchi-Tragtenberg (KT) model [3], etc). Formal neurons may be represented by ordinary differential equations (e.g. HR), or by maps, which are dynamical systems with continuous state variables and discrete time dynamics (e.g. KT). A few maps had been proposed to describe neurons [3-10]. Such maps provide one with a number of computational advantages [10], since there is no need to set any precision on the integration variable, which leads to better performance in the calculations.

An extended KT neuron model, here called KTz model, has been studied in [4] and [5], may be supplied with a Chemical Synapse Map (CSM) in order to study interacting neurons in a lattice, in the framework of coupled map lattices. KTz model presents most of the standard behavior of excitable cells like fast spiking, regular spiking, bursting, plateau action potentials and adaptation phenomena, and the CSM is in good agreement with some standard functions used to model post-synaptic currents, like the alpha function or the double-exponential function [4]. Preliminary results indicate antiferromagnetic oscillatory behavior or plane wave behavior in KTz neurons coupled with inhibitory CSM on a square lattice.

Besides, many systems in nature are characterized by complex behavior where large cascades of events, named avalanches, unpredictably alternate with periods of little activity (e.g. snow avalanches, earthquakes, etc). Avalanches are described by power law distributions and when the branching parameter equals to unity, the system is said to be a self-organized critical (SOC) system [13]. These have been observed for neuronal activity in vitro [11,12]. And since both SOC systems and neuronal activity show large variability, long-term stability and memory capabilities, networks of neurons have been proposed to be SOC systems. This hypothesis was tested in [13], where they made comparisons among in vivo recordings using Local Field Potentials in three macaque monkeys performing a short term memory task and three different well-established subsampled SOC models (e.g. Sandpile model, Random Neighbour Sandpile model and Forest Fire model). Some similar comparison has been done in [14] with in vivo data from fourteen rats and a cellular automaton developed by the authors.

We claim that still no simulation has been made to detect whether formal or realistic neuron models can evolve naturally to a SOC state, in a full or subsampled network. Our simulations are made with KTz model, which is a formal neuron, but keeps the usual behaviors of living cells, connected through CSM on a square lattice. We divided the work into two parts: (i) the analysis of network itself and how it evolves with time from a given initial state, varying its parameters and (ii) the analysis of the data generated by a network of silent cells, stimulated at random sites, trying to resemble the SOC models above. We compare these second part results with the experimental ones presented in [11-13].


  1. Hodgkin A, Huxley A: A quantitative description of membrane current.

    J Physiol 1952, 117(4):500-544. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  2. Hindmarsh JL, Rose RM: A model of neuronal bursting.

    Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1984, 221:87-102. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  3. Kinouchi O, Tragtenberg MHR: Modeling neurons by simple maps.

    Int J Bifurcat Chaos 1996, 6:2343-2360. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  4. Kuva SM, Lima GF, Kinouchi O, Tragtenberg MHR, Roque AC: A minimal model for excitable and bursting elements.

    Neurocomputing 2001, 38-40:255-261. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  5. Copelli M, Tragtenberg MHR, Kinouchi O: Stability diagrams for bursting neurons.

    Physica A 2004, 342:263-269. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  6. Chialvo DR: Generic excitable dynamics on a two-dimensional map.

    Chaos Solit Fract 1995, 5:461-479. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  7. Rulkov NF: Modeling of spiking-bursting neuronal behavior using two-dimensional map.

    Phys Rev E 2002, 65:041922. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  8. Cazelles B, Courbage M, Rabinovich M: Anti-phase regularization.

    Europhys Lett 2001, 56:504-509. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  9. Laing CR, Longtin A: A two variable model of somaticdendritic interactions.

    Bull Math Biol 2002, 64:829-860. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  10. Izhikevich EM, Hoppensteadt F: Classification of bursting mappings.

    Int J Bifurcat Chaos 2004, 14(11):3847-3854. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  11. Beggs JM, Plenz D: Neuronal avalanches in neocortical circuits.

    J Neurosci 2003, 23(35):11167-11177. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  12. Beggs JM, Plenz D: Neuronal avalanches are diverse and precise activity patterns that are stable for many hours in cortical slice cultures.

    J Neurosci 2004, 24(22):5216-5229. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  13. Priesemann V, Munk MHJ, Wibral M: Subsampling effects in neuronal avalanche.

    BMC Neurosci 2009, 10:40. PubMed Abstract | BioMed Central Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  14. Ribeiro TL, Copelli M, Caixeta F, Belchior H, Chialvo DR, Nicolelis MAL, Ribeiro S: Spike avalanches exhibit universal dynamics across the sleep-wake cycle.

    PLoS One 2010, 5(11):e14129. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL