Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Neuroscience and BioMed Central.

This article is part of the supplement: Nineteenth Annual Computational Neuroscience Meeting: CNS*2010

Open Access Open Badges Poster Presentation

Response dynamics of stochastic integrate-and-fire neurons

Joanna Pressley1 and Todd W Troyer2*

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Mathematics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37240, USA

2 Department of Biology, University of Texas, San Antonio, Texas, 78249, USA

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Neuroscience 2010, 11(Suppl 1):P22  doi:10.1186/1471-2202-11-S1-P22

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at:

Published:20 July 2010

© 2010 Troyer and Pressley; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Poster Presentation

The leaky integrate-and-fire (LIF) is the simplest neuron model that captures the essential properties of neuronal signaling while seemingly remaining simple enough to analyze. Yet, a comprehensive description of LIF response to time-varying stochastic input is lacking. As a first step, we survey the linear component of LIF responses over a wide range of baseline input parameters. Using a diffusion approximation, we calculate the relative gain as a function of frequency for three types of sinusoidal input modulations: modulations of the mean input current, modulations of the variance of the input current, and co-modulation of the mean and variance to simulate rate modulation of a Poisson input spike train. The output parameter is the time-dependent probability of producing a spike, i.e. the ensemble firing rate. In accord with common intuitions, we find that the stochastic LIF model displays low pass behavior for modulations of the mean, with the gain going to zero at high frequency. For baseline levels of mean current that are supra-threshold, the gain is enhanced by resonances at modulation frequencies near the baseline firing rate [1]. A quantitative analysis of the low-pass corner frequency shows that when operating at low rates the model responds at higher frequencies than the passive membrane filtering would suggest. Furthermore, at higher baseline frequencies f, cutoff frequencies are in the range of 4f, much greater than the f/2 cutoff expected from Nyquist arguments. For modulations in the input variance, we also find peaks in the gain function but these peaks persist into the regime of fluctuation-driven firing and the peak of these resonances does not correspond to the baseline firing rate. In accord with previous studies [2], gain values approach one at high frequencies across parameters. However, the low frequency gain is highly regime-dependent, with the low frequency gain much greater than one in the fluctuation-driven regime. The low-frequency gain is also highly regime-dependent in response to modulations in Poisson input rate. However, for frequencies greater than the inverse of the membrane time constant, the gain curves, for all baseline parameters, coalesce into a common trajectory toward a gain of one. Several of these response properties can be understood by noting that the ensemble firing rate depends on a multiplicative interaction between separate underlying factors, one of which is proportional to the present value of the input variance and the other which depends on the dynamics of integration and reset. However, further work will be needed to understand the response at frequencies significantly greater than expected from simple membrane filtering or firing rate sampling, and to understand the nature of the firing rate resonances in response to modulations of input variance.


  1. Knight BW: The relationship between the _ring rate of a single neuron and the level of activity in a population of neurons. experimental evidence for resonant enhancement in the population response.

    J Gen Physiology 1972, 59(6):767-778. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  2. Lindner B, Schimansky-Geier L: Transmission of noise coded versus additive signals through a neuronal ensemble.

    Phys Rev Lett 2001, 86(14):2934-2937. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL