Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Neuroscience and BioMed Central.

This article is part of the supplement: Eighteenth Annual Computational Neuroscience Meeting: CNS*2009

Open Access Poster presentation

Hippocampal formation as unitary coherent particle filter

Charles Fox* and Tony Prescott

Author Affiliations

Adaptive Behaviour Research Group, University of Sheffield, UK

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Neuroscience 2009, 10(Suppl 1):P275  doi:10.1186/1471-2202-10-S1-P275

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at:

Published:13 July 2009

© 2009 Fox and Prescott; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Poster presentation

A standard approach to localization, recall and prediction from sensors is the Hidden Markov Model (HMM, [1]), with location as hidden state and sense data as observations. Assuming that hippocampus performs a similar task, we present a new top-down mapping of this function onto its anatomy. In localization models of CA3 [2], firing rates of individual place cells encode probabilities over current location and recurrent connections may represent transitions probabilities between them. In auto-associative models [3], recurrent connections bring the network into a vector-coded memorized state. The existence of cells encoding rewards and locations of external objects supports this view [3].

Consider localization and auto-associative models in the light of HMMs, which represent probabilities over the complete set of discrete hidden states, as in localization models. However, inferences about high-level sensory data, including locations of external objects and rewards, require that the structure of these states be complex: for example, a state could include conjunctions of the agents' own location and heading with the configurations of many external objects, rewards, even the agent's own actions. Such states are best represented by configurations of large numbers of Boolean variables, playing a similar role to auto-associative model nodes.

We present a resolution between localization and auto-association models. HMMs become intractable for complex states and it is common to approximate them by particle filters (PFs, [4]). PFs approximate posteriors by samples. In particular, a "unitary" particle filter maintains just a single sample. CA3 could unitarily sample posteriors from a complex state space containing Boolean variables coding presence or absence of objects at locations.

A standard PF problem is getting "lost:" when the samples no longer include the true state, it becomes difficult for inference to return there even if strongly suggested by the data. To recover, a useful heuristic [4] is to monitor matches between predictions and input, and flatten the prior over hidden states when during prolonged poor matches. We model subiculum performing such monitoring, and its resultant septal ACh flattening the transition prior in CA3. This contrasts with ACh models [5] that disable CA3 recurrency for learning rather than inference.

We model superficial and deep entorhinal cortex representing likelihood and posterior percepts; dentate gyrus (DG) extracting features to change the representation basis, and CA1 performing the inverse transform to DG. Preliminary plus maze simulations (figure 1) show subiculum enabling CA3 recovery of correct state estimates following being lost.

thumbnailFigure 1. Left: screenshot of maze simulation. The agent visits N-S-E-W arms in turn. Right: ground truth and estimates of y component of location. The agent is lost during the E arm; only with Sub enabled does it recover for the W arm.


  1. Rabiner LR: A tutorial on hidden Markov models.

    Proc IEEE 1989, 77:257-286. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  2. Arleo A, et al.: Place cells and spatial navigation.

    Proc NIPS 2001, 13. OpenURL

  3. Rolls ET: Memory, attention and decision making.

    Chapter 2. OUP 2008. OpenURL

  4. Fox C, Quinn J: How to be lost.

    Proc Int Computer Music Conf 2007. OpenURL

  5. Hasselmo M, et al.: Dynamics of learning and recall.

    J Neurosci 1995, 15:5249-5262. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL