Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Neuroscience and BioMed Central.

This article is part of the supplement: Eighteenth Annual Computational Neuroscience Meeting: CNS*2009

Open Access Poster presentation

Configuration-specific facilitation phenomena explained by layer 2/3 summation pools in V1

Baran Çürüklü1* and Anders Lansner2

Author Affiliations

1 School of Innovation, Design and Engineering, Mälardalen University, Västerås, 721 23, Sweden

2 School of Science and Communication, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, 100 44, Sweden

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Neuroscience 2009, 10(Suppl 1):P177  doi:10.1186/1471-2202-10-S1-P177


The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2202/10/S1/P177


Published:13 July 2009

© 2009 Çürüklü and Lansner; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Introduction

Our laminar model of the layers 4 and 2/3 of V1 addresses development of the horizontal connections found in these two cortical layers as well as configuration-specific facilitation phenomena [1]. We assumed that in both these cortical layers synapse strengths are subject to change due to visual experience. In the model, poorly tuned LGN input targets solely layer 4, whereas layer 2/3 receives sensory input from layer 4. Based on these assumptions, the model demonstrates how correlation based networks of horizontal connections are developed simultaneously in both these layers. Rapid improvement of orientation selectivity (OS) during the first weeks after eye opening, when the eyes are subject to normal visual experience has been reported earlier in several species [2,3]. Note that this critical period coincides with the development of the horizontal connections [3].

Conclusion

A fully developed layer 2/3 network consists of elongated summations pools. Thus, each minicolumn model receives input from a region that is axially specific along its orientation axis. In this network, modular specificity is prominent as well, i.e. projections target mainly iso-orientation domains. The elongated summation pools in layer 2/3 can address configuration-specific facilitation phenomena (Figure 1). Simulation results suggest that the visibility of a grating stimulus is improved due to its elongation along the direction that coincides with orientation axis. Elongation of a grating stimulus along the orthogonal axis results in a less prominent facilitation. In both cases facilitation effects are more prominent in low-contrast conditions. In this model the layer 4 network is isotropic and hence does not take part in the facilitation process. Thus, we hypothesize that anisotropic recurrent connections found in layer 2/3 are sufficient for explaining this phenomenon.

thumbnailFigure 1. Probability of correct detection for a layer 2/3 minicolumn model is a function of both stimulus configuration and contrast. Network behavior is investigated on four contrast levels (5, 10, 20, and 100%), and three stimulus configurations (circular, orthogonal and collinear configuration).

References

  1. Polat U, Norcia AM: Elongated physiological summation pools in the human visual cortex.

    Vision Res 1998, 38:3735-3741. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  2. Hubel DH, Wiesel TN: Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex.

    J Physiol 1962, 160:106-154. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  3. White LE, Coppola DM, Fitzpatrick D: The contribution of sensory experience to the maturation of orientation selectivity in ferret visual cortex.

    Nature 2001, 411:1049-1052. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL