Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Neuroscience and BioMed Central.

This article is part of the supplement: Eighteenth Annual Computational Neuroscience Meeting: CNS*2009

Open Access Oral presentation

Fast and reliable methods for extracting functional connectivity in large populations

Yasser Roudi1*, Joanna Tyrcha2 and John Hertz13

Author Affiliations

1 NORDITA, Roslagstullsbacken 23, 10691 Stockholm, Sweden

2 Dept of Mathematical Statistics, Stockholm University, 10691 Stockholm, Sweden

3 The Niels Bohr Institute, Copenhagen University, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Neuroscience 2009, 10(Suppl 1):O9  doi:10.1186/1471-2202-10-S1-O9


The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2202/10/S1/O9


Published:13 July 2009

© 2009 Roudi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Oral presentation

The simplest model for describing multi-neuron spike statistics is the pairwise Ising model [1,2]. To start, one divides the spike trains into small time bins, and to each neuron i and each time bin t assigns a binary variables si(t) = -1 if neuron i has not emitted any spikes in that time bin and 1 if it has emitted one or more spikes. One then can construct an Ising model, P(s) = Z-1exp{h's+s'Js} for the spike patterns with the same means and pair correlations as the data, using Boltzmann learning, which is in principle exact. The elements Jij, of the matrix J can be considered to be functional couplings. However, Boltzmann learning is prohibitively time-consuming for large networks. Here, we compare the results from five fast approximate methods for finding the couplings with those from Boltzmann learning.

We used data from a simulated network of spiking neurons operating in a balanced state of asynchronous firing with a mean rate of ~10 Hz for excitatory neurons. Employing a bin size of 10 ms, we performed Boltzmann learning to fit Ising models for populations of size N up to 200 excitatory neurons chosen randomly from the 800 in the simulated network. We studied the following methods: A) a naive mean-field approximation, for which J is equal to the negative of the inverse covariance matrix, B) an independent-pair approximation, C) a low rate, small-population approximation (the low-rate limit of (B), which is valid generally in the limit of small Nrt, where r is the average rate (spikes/time bin) and t is the bin width [3], D) inversion of the TAP equations from spin-glass theory [4] and E) a weak-correlation approximation proposed recently by Sessak and Monasson [5]. We quantified the quality of these approximations, as functions of N, by computing the RMS error and R2, treating the Boltzmann couplings as the true ones. We found, as shown in figure 1, that while all the approximations are good for small N, the TAP, Sessak-Monasson, and, in particular, their average outperform the others by a relatively large margin for N. Thus, these methods offer a useful tool for fast analysis of multineuron spike data.

thumbnailFigure 1. (a) R2 and (b) RMS error for various approximate methods. Green (dashed dotted), naive mean-field; Purple (dashed double-dotted) low-rate, small N; Gray (dotted) independent-pair; Red (dashed), TAP; Black (dashed), Sessak-Monasson; Blue, average of TAP and Sessak-Monasson.

References

  1. Schneidman E, Berry MJ 2nd, Segev R, Bialek W: Weak pairwise correlations imply strongly correlated network states in a neural population.

    Nature 2006, 440:1007-1012. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  2. Shlens J, Field GD, Gauthier JL, Grivich MI, Petrusca D, Sher A, Litke AM, Chichilnisky EJ: The structure of multi-neuron firing patterns in primate retina.

    J Neurosci 2008, 28:505-518. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  3. Roudi Y, Nirenberg S, Latham P: Pairwise maximum entropy models for large biological systems: when they can and when they can't work. arXiv:0811.0903v1 [q-bio.QM].

  4. Tanaka T: Mean-field theory of Boltzmann machine learning.

    Phys Rev E 1998, 58:2302-2310. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  5. Sessak V, Monasson R: Small-correlation expansions for the inverse Ising problem.

    J Phys A 2009, 42:055001. Publisher Full Text OpenURL