Figure 4.

ΔCt method for HKG selection. ΔCt variability in HKG comparisons were shown as medians (lines), 25th percentile to the 75th percentile (boxes) and ranges (whiskers) for all the 21 sample pools. A. Comparisons of the completely possible sets of HKGs which included ACT11, ACT2/7, G6PD, ELF1B, UBC2; B. Comparisons of the completely possible sets of HKGs, which included ELF1A, TUB, TUA, CYP2 and UBQ10.

Jian et al. BMC Molecular Biology 2008 9:59   doi:10.1186/1471-2199-9-59
Download authors' original image