Table 3 |
||||
|
Comparison of phage titer determinations with DLA and with PAMA using different antibiotics |
||||
|
DLA |
AMP [0.5] |
CEF [0.06] |
TET [1.5] |
|
|
|
||||
|
phi PVP-SE1 |
||||
|
|
||||
|
PFUs (average ± SD) |
14 ± 5 |
55 ± 10 |
53 ± 11 |
58 ± 10 |
|
|
||||
|
SD % |
38 |
19 |
21 |
17 |
|
|
||||
|
phi PVP-SE2 |
||||
|
|
||||
|
PFUs (average ± SD) |
54 ± 4 |
54 ± 5 |
48 ± 11 |
51 ± 3 |
|
|
||||
|
SD % |
8 |
8 |
23 |
6 |
|
|
||||
|
DLA: classical Double-Layer Agar technique; AMP [0.5]: PAMA with 0.5 mg/l ampicillin; CEF [0.06]: PAMA with 0.06 mg/l cefotaxime; TET [1.5]: PAMA with 1.5 mg/l tetracycline. |
||||
|
Santos et al. BMC Microbiology 2009 9:148 doi:10.1186/1471-2180-9-148 |
||||
