Log on / register
Feedback | Support | My details
Open AccessResearch article

Molecular analysis of the emergence of pandemic Vibrio parahaemolyticus

E Fidelma Boyd1 email, Ana Luisa V Cohen1,2 email, Lynn M Naughton1,2 email, David W Ussery3 email, Tim T Binnewies3 email, O Colin Stine4 email and Michelle A Parent1,5 email

1Department of Biological Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA

2Department of Microbiology, UCC, National University of Ireland-Cork, Ireland

3Center for Biological Sequence Analysis, BioCentrum, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Kgs, Lyngby, Denmark

4Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA

5Department of Medical Technology, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA

author email corresponding author email

BMC Microbiology 2008, 8:110doi:10.1186/1471-2180-8-110

Published: 30 June 2008

Abstract

Background

Vibrio parahaemolyticus is abundant in the aquatic environment particularly in warmer waters and is the leading cause of seafood borne gastroenteritis worldwide. Prior to 1995, numerous V. parahaemolyticus serogroups were associated with disease, however, in that year an O3:K6 serogroup emerged in Southeast Asia causing large outbreaks and rapid hospitalizations. This new highly virulent strain is now globally disseminated.

Results

We performed a four-way BLAST analysis on the genome sequence of V. parahaemolyticus RIMD2210633, an O3:K6 isolate from Japan recovered in 1996, versus the genomes of four published Vibrio species and constructed genome BLAST atlases. We identified 24 regions, gaps in the genome atlas, of greater than 10 kb that were unique to RIMD2210633. These 24 regions included an integron, f237 phage, 2 type III secretion systems (T3SS), a type VI secretion system (T6SS) and 7 Vibrio parahaemolyticus genomic islands (VPaI-1 to VPaI-7). Comparative genomic analysis of our fifth genome, V. parahaemolyticus AQ3810, an O3:K6 isolate recovered in 1983, identified four regions unique to each V. parahaemolyticus strain. Interestingly, AQ3810 did not encode 8 of the 24 regions unique to RMID, including a T6SS, which suggests an additional virulence mechanism in RIMD2210633. The distribution of only the VPaI regions was highly variable among a collection of 42 isolates and phylogenetic analysis of these isolates show that these regions are confined to a pathogenic clade.

Conclusion

Our data show that there is considerable genomic flux in this species and that the new highly virulent clone arose from an O3:K6 isolate that acquired at least seven novel regions, which included both a T3SS and a T6SS.


© 1999-2008 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated