|
Comparison between antimicrobial susceptibility and OP phenotype of LES isolates |
|||
| Antimicrobial agent |
% resistant LES isolates for different OP phenotypes |
||
|
|
|||
| OP (n = 11) |
Negative (n = 17) |
N or I (n = 5) |
|
|
|
|||
| CAZ R |
73 |
24 |
20 |
| ATM R |
64 |
35 |
0 |
| MER R |
91 |
65 |
20 |
| TOB R |
27 |
24 |
20 |
| TOB D |
45 |
12 |
40 |
| CIP R |
0 |
6 |
20 |
| CIP D |
27 |
12 |
20 |
|
CAZ, ceftazidime; ATM, aztreonam; MER, meropenem; TOB, tobramycin; CIP, ciprofloxacin; R, resistant; D, intermediate antimicrobial susceptibility; N, normal; I, intermediate OP phenotype | |||
Fothergill et al. BMC Microbiology 2007 7:45 doi:10.1186/1471-2180-7-45 |
|||