Table 2

Antimicrobial resistance ofE. faeciumandE. faecalis
Number (%) of isolates
Resistant to a single antimicrobial agent Sensitive MDR phenotype
GM ST AM CIP LVX TE SYN E S
E. faecium n = 244
W = INF (n = 19) 1 (5.3) 3 (15.8) 1 (5.3) 6 (31.6) 1 (5.3) 5 (26.3) 6 (31.6) 7 (36.8) 6 (31.6) 4 (21.1)
W-BR (n = 36) 1 (2.8) 2 (5.6) 1 (2.8) 12 (33.2) 3 (8.3) 7 (19.4) 19 (52.8) 16 (44.4) 10 (27.8) 8 (22.2)
W-EFF (n = 53) 3 (5.7) 2 (3.8) 4 (7.5) 23 (43.4) 10 (18.9) 10 (18.9) 18 (34.0) 24 (45.3) 12 (22.6) 14 (26.4)
W-MOut (n = 29) 0 6 (20.7) 6 (20.7) 13 (44.8) 4 (13.8) 8 (27.6) 14 (48.3) 17 (58.6) 5 (17.4) 9 (31.0)
D-EFF (n = 41) 1 (2.4) 6 (14.6) 5 (12.2) 13 (31.7) 2 (4.9) 10 (24.4) 12 (29.2) 28 (68.2) 4 (9.8) 8 (19.5)
D-MOut (n = 40) 1 (2.5) 2 (5) 2 (5) 14 (35.0) 3 (7.5) 2 (5.0) 21 (52.5) 22 (55.0) 7 (17.5) 3 (7.5)
VR (n = 26) 0 1 (3.8) 0 8 (30.8) 1 (3.8) 2 (7.7) 15 (57.7) 11 (42.4) 3 (11.5) 3 (11.5)
All (n = 244) 7 (2.9) 22 (9.0) 19 (7.8) 90 (36.9) 24 (9.8) 44 (18.0) 105 (43.0) 125 (51.2) 49 (20.1) 47 (19.3)
E. faecalis n = 63
W-INF (n = 5) 0 1 (20.0) 0 1 (20.0) 0 1 (20.0) na 1 (20.0) 4 (80.0) 0
W-BR (n = 8) 2 (25.0) 2 (25.0) 1 (12.5) 2 (25.0) 2 (25.0) 2 (25.0) na 7 (87.5) 1 (12.5) 2 (25.0)
W-EFF (n = 19) 0 1 (5.3) 1 (5.3) 3 (15.8) 3 (15.8) 4 (21.1) na 13 (68.4) 0 3 (15.8)
W-MOut (n = 4) 0 0 0 0 0 0 na 4 (100) 0 0
D-EFF (n = 19) 2 (10.5) 5 (26.3) 0 1 (5.3) 0 9 (47.4) na 13 (68.4) 4 (21.1) 5 (26.3)
D-MOut (n = 3) 1 (33.3) 1 (33.3) 0 0 0 2 (66.7) na 2 (66.7) 0 1 (33.3)
VR (n = 5) 0 0 0 2 (40.0) 0 0 na 1 (20.0) 2 (40.0) 0
All (n = 63) 5 (7.9) 10 (15.9) 2 (3.2) 9 (14.3) 5 (7.9) 18 (28.6) na 41 (65.1) 11 (17.5) 11 (17.5)

GM, gentamicin; ST, streptomycin; AM, ampicillin; CIP, ciprofloxacin; LVX, levofloxacin; TE, tetracycline; SYN, quinupristin-dalfopristin; E, erythromycin; S, sensitive to all tested antimicrobial agents; MDR, multiple drug resistance; na, not applicable.

Abbreviations of sampling points’ locations and their description provided in Figure 1.

Sadowy and Luczkiewicz

Sadowy and Luczkiewicz BMC Microbiology 2014 14:66   doi:10.1186/1471-2180-14-66

Open Data