Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Microbiology and BioMed Central.

Open Access Research article

Regulation of the expression level of transcription factor XylS reveals new functional insight into its induction mechanism at the Pm promoter

Friederike Zwick, Rahmi Lale* and Svein Valla

Author Affiliations

Department of Biotechnology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Sem Sælands Vei 6/8, Trondheim N-7491, Norway

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Microbiology 2013, 13:262  doi:10.1186/1471-2180-13-262

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2180/13/262


Received:30 July 2013
Accepted:18 November 2013
Published:19 November 2013

© 2013 Zwick et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background

XylS is the positive regulator of the inducible Pm promoter, originating from Pseudomonas putida, where the system controls a biochemical pathway involved in degradation of aromatic hydrocarbons, which also act as inducers. The XylS/Pm positive regulator/promoter system is used for recombinant gene expression and the output from Pm is known to be sensitive to the intracellular XylS concentration.

Results

By constructing a synthetic operon consisting of xylS and luc, the gene encoding luciferase, relative XylS expression levels could be monitored indirectly at physiological concentrations. Expression of XylS from inducible promoters allowed control over a more than 800-fold range, however, the corresponding output from Pm covered only an about five-fold range. The maximum output from Pm could not be increased by introducing more copies of the promoter in the cells. Interestingly, a previously reported XylS variant (StEP-13), known to strongly stimulate expression from Pm, caused the same maximum activity from Pm as wild-type XylS at high XylS expression levels. Under uninduced conditions expression from Pm also increased as a function of XylS expression levels, and at very high concentrations the maximum activity from Pm was the same as in the presence of inducer.

Conclusion

According to our proposed model, which is in agreement with current knowledge, the regulator, XylS, can exist in three states: monomers, dimers, and aggregates. Only the dimers are active and able to induce expression from Pm. Their maximum intracellular concentration and the corresponding output from Pm are limited by the concentration-dependent conversion into inactive aggregates. Maximization of the induction ratio at Pm can be obtained by expression of XylS at the level where aggregation occurs, which might be exploited for recombinant gene expression. The results described here also indicate that there might exist variants of XylS which can exist at higher active dimer concentrations and thus lead to increased expression levels from Pm.

Keywords:
XylS; Pm; Recombinant gene expression; Induction ratio

Background

Regulated promoters are commonly used in recombinant protein production processes and are particularly important for production of host-toxic proteins or proteins that cause a serious metabolic burden to the host cells [1,2]. The transcription regulator XylS stimulates expression from the Pm promoter in the presence of benzoic acid or derivatives thereof [3]. XylS originates from the Pseudomonas putida TOL-plasmid and is expressed from two different promoters, Ps1 and Ps2: Ps1 is regulated, while Ps2 is constitutive [4]. The production level of XylS from Ps2 is low, leading to an estimated amount of about 200 molecules per cell [5].

XylS belongs to the AraC/XylS family of transcription factors and it has been shown to be transcriptionally active as a dimer. Dimerization occurs both in the absence and presence of inducer, but to a greater extent in its presence [5,6]. In spite of sequence similarities and common functional domains, the different members of the AraC/XylS family act via a range of different mechanisms. AraC, for example, forms dimers like XylS, both in the presence and absence of inducer [7]. In the presence of inducer it acts as an activator of gene expression (like XylS), but in the absence of inducer, it represses gene expression via DNA bending. The first two proteins of the AraC/XylS family, for which 3D crystal structures have been determined, were RobA and MarA, and both exist as monomers only [8].

XylS consists of two domains and structural models exist for both, constructed based on sequence alignments [9,10]. The model of the N-terminal domain proposes a β-barrel, which is involved in inducer binding and two α-helices that probably are involved in dimerization [10-12]. In the C-terminal domain seven α-helices that form two helix-turn-helix motifs are proposed [9]. These motifs are responsible for binding to two direct repeats with the sequence TGCAN6GGNTA upstream of the -35 box of Pm[13,14]. The second binding site overlaps by two bases with the -35 box and this overlap is essential for transcription initiation from Pm[15]. Both domains are thought to interact with the host RNA polymerase (RNAP) [16-19].

The N-terminal domain has been shown to suppress the action of the C-terminal domain in the absence of inducer [5,20]. Binding of wild type XylS to DNA can only be observed when the protein is dimerized [5]. A XylS-variant which is unable to form dimers has been shown to bind to DNA only in the presence of inducer, which leads to the same conformational changes as dimerization, however, this particular variant is unable to activate expression from Pm[5]. Recently it has been shown that XylS dimers bind to DNA sequentially. The first monomer to bind is the one proximal to the RNAP binding site. This leads to [10DNA bending, which in turn enables the second monomer to bind, and indicates that XylS is dimerized prior to DNA binding [16]. At typical cell-internal XylS-levels only 30-40% of the Pm promoter sequences are occupied in vitro and it has been proposed that complete occupancy cannot be achieved by XylS amounts which do not exceed its intracellular solubility [21].

Vectors which combine the XylS/Pm expression system with the broad-host-range mini-RK2 replicon [22,23], in which XylS is expressed from its natural Ps2 promoter, have been shown to be capable of producing recombinant proteins at industrial levels in Escherichia coli[24,25]. Expression levels of these vectors could be heavily increased by mutating different DNA control elements of the expression cassette [10,26,27], and recently it has been demonstrated that they could be yet further improved when mutated DNA elements were combined [28]. When induced expression levels are increased it leads, in most cases, to undesired high expression levels also in the absence of inducer. For the XylS/Pm expression system the background expression could be strongly reduced when the 5′-UTR flanking the Shine-Dalgarno site was mutagenized and this has been demonstrated to be useful for metabolic engineering purposes [29]. With this approach an induction ratio of 260-fold could be reached, however, as a consequence induced expression levels were also reduced for these constructs. A possible alternative method of reducing uninduced expression could be to regulate the XylS expression level. Previous experiments have shown that strong XylS overexpression, as for example from the bacteriophage T7 promoter or from Ps1, results in a complete loss of inducibility [21,30]. Fusion of xylS to the Psal promoter, which can be activated by similar inducers as Pm, allowed simultaneous induction of XylS expression and XylS activation. Induction ratios that could be reached by this approach were about 180- to 240-fold [31].

Here we report a more detailed study on the relationship between XylS expression levels and expression levels achieved from the Pm promoter, both under induced and uninduced conditions. Based on the outcomes of this study we propose a model that aims to explain the behaviour of XylS as a function of its concentration and its formation of monomers, dimers and higher order oligomers.

Results and discussion

Construction of a synthetic operon that can be used to indirectly measure relative XylS expression levels

With the goal to enable detection of XylS at low concentrations we developed a synthetic operon in which luciferase functions as an indirect indicator of expression of XylS from its native Ps2 promoter. In this design the luc gene is transcriptionally fused to xylS via overlapping stop and start codons and should be translated only when xylS is translated first. The new plasmid was designated as pFS7 (Figure 1). To test the functionality of this construct we used a series of xylS variant sequences which had been synthesized. These variants contain synonymous codon changes relative to the wild type sequence and had been found to activate Pm to varying extents (in the presence of induction). We hypothesized that the effects of the codon changes were caused by variations in xylS mRNA translation, since transcript amounts were found to be similar to the levels of the wild type gene (qRT-PCR, data not shown). Nine such variant sequences were tested in pFS7, and luciferase activities were measured (Figure 2). The values varied in the range from about 20 to 100% of that of the construct containing the wild type xylS.

thumbnailFigure 1. Map of plasmid pFS7.Ps2: constitutive promoter; xylS: gene encoding Pm activator; luc: gene encoding luciferase; Pm: positively regulated promoter; bla: ampicillin resistance gene encoding β-lactamase; t1: rrnBT1T2 bidirectional transcriptional terminator; trfA: gene encoding the replication protein; oriV: origin of vegetative replication; kan: kanamycin resistance gene; oriT: origin of conjugal transfer. The DNA sequence of the overlapping stop-start codon is depicted.

thumbnailFigure 2. Expression levels from pFS7 for different variants of xylS with silent mutations. Relative expression levels from Pm (measured as maximum ampicillin tolerance at 1 mM m-toluate) are given in grey (error bars = lowest ampicillin concentrations in test on which no growth was observed) and relative luciferase activity as a measure for XylS amounts in black (values from at least two biological replicas). All values (relative ampicillin tolerance and luciferase expression) refer to those of wild type XylS (tolerating 350 μg mL-1), which are both arbitrarily set to 1. Mutations in the variants (1 to 9), the number stands for the base position that has been changed, relative to the translational start site, the character tells the base in the variant. 1: 6- > C; 2: 13- > C; 3: 15- > G; 4: 16- > C; 5: 27- > G; 6: 30- > C; 7: 36- > T; 8: 42- > T; 9: all of the eight mutations.

The design of plasmid pFS7 also allowed us to study the effects of the changed XylS expression on activation of Pm. For this purpose the bla gene, encoding β-lactamase, was used as a reporter (see Figure 1). We have previously used this gene to monitor expression from Pm, since the tolerance of the host to ampicillin correlates well with the produced amounts of β-lactamase in a directly proportional way [32], up to ampicillin concentrations of 16 mg mL-1, thus making it easier to identify clones with desired phenotype without laborious library screening [10,26,27]. The data for luciferase activities and host ampicillin tolerances on agar medium correlated well (Figure 2). As an additional control we compared the ampicillin tolerances of all the nine constructs (and wild type) to those in plasmid pTA13 (similar to pFS7, but without luc), and found that the relative maximum ampicillin tolerances between the corresponding hosts were essentially the same (data not shown). These results indicate that luciferase activities reflect the levels of XylS expression in the cells, and that the activity of Pm also correlates with XylS expression, at least at these physiological and low concentrations.

In trans activation of expression from Pm by XylS increases the induction ratio

The XylS concentrations that could be generated via synonymous codon variants spanned only a five-fold range, and none of the expression levels were significantly higher than that of the wild type xylS gene (Figure 2). To expand the concentration range and increase the maximum level of expression from Pm, we expressed XylS in trans from a separate plasmid compatible with pFS7. This plasmid was based on the pBBR1 replicon (about five-fold higher copy number than the mini-RK2 replicons) and the xylS gene under its native Ps2 promoter (as in pFS7) was inserted, generating pFZ2A. The xylS and luc genes were deleted from plasmid pFS7 leading to pFS15. Maximum ampicillin tolerances of cells containing both pFZ2A (expressing xylS-luc) and pFS15 (harboring Pm) were approximately 5 μg mL-1 (uninduced) and 2500 μg mL-1 (induced with 1 mM m-toluate), which gives rise to an induction ratio as high as about 500-fold. The increase in ampicillin tolerance in the presence of m-toluate, compared to the setting where XylS is expressed in cis (pFS7, 350 μg mL-1), was not unexpected and might be explained by the higher copy number of plasmid pFZ2A relative to pFS7, leading to more XylS expression. In contrast, the uninduced background level (expression from the promoter in the absence of induction) remained significantly lower in the trans situation than in the cis situation, in fact it was similar to the cellular background tolerance in the absence of any plasmid. This phenomenon might be explained by the fact that XylS will dimerize only occasionally in the absence of inducer. Probably the concentration of XylS and consequentially also dimers of the protein is highest near the site of synthesis. The larger spatial distance from Pm in the trans situation will then lead to a lack of dimers at the promoter site. In the cis situation the chance of XylS dimers to bind to Pm will be higher, as the protein is produced in close proximity to the promoter. The lower background level in the trans situation may be of practical interest, for example in cases where expression from Pm is maximized by mutations in the expression cassette [28], and especially for expression of toxic proteins. In the context of the experiments reported here, the in trans system seems clearly well suited for more in-depth studies of the relation between XylS expression and activation of Pm in the absence and presence of induction.

Use of the regulated Pb promoter to control the xylS expression level

The experiments described above as well as previously published studies [21,31] demonstrate that expression from Pm can be increased by producing more XylS, and to determine what the maximum level is we decided to use the inducible Pb promoter from Acinetobacter sp. to express XylS. Pb, like Pm, can be used to regulate expression of genes in a continuously graded manner [33]. It is positively regulated by the ChnR protein, which also belongs to the AraC/XylS transcription factor family, in the presence of its inducer cyclohexanone. The xylS-luc operon expressed from Pb and the gene of the activator protein, chnR, were cloned into pBBR1MCS-5 [34], generating pFZ2B1, and pFS15 was used as target plasmid for XylS harboring the Pm promoter, as described above. Cells containing both of these plasmids were plated on agar medium, supplemented with varying amounts of ampicillin, cyclohexanone and m-toluate. As expected, cells with only one of the two plasmids (either pFZ2B1 or pFS15) reacted only marginally to the addition of the inducers. However, in the presence of both plasmids the ampicillin tolerance of the host cells varied as a function of both the cyclohexanone and m-toluate concentrations. At a fixed 1 mM m-toluate concentration the host ampicillin tolerance correlated well with both the concentration of cyclohexanone and the luciferase activity, which reflects XylS expression (Figure 3, grey squares). However, at the two highest concentrations of cyclohexanone tested (1 and 2 mM) the upper ampicillin tolerances were similar (3500 μg mL-1) and about 5.4 times higher than in the absence of the Pb inducer.

thumbnailFigure 3. Effects of variations in wild type or variant XylS expression on Pm activity. Upper host ampicillin tolerance levels as a function of the expression level of wild type XylS (pFZ2B1) or variant StEP-13 (pFZ2B1.StEP-13), using two different copy number variants (pFS15 and pFS15.271) of the target plasmid. Pm activity was measured as upper relative ampicillin tolerance on agar medium. The tolerance for cells containing pFZ2B1 + pFS15, no cyclohexanone, was arbitrarily set to 1 and corresponds to about 650 μg mL-1 ampicillin resistance. The relative XylS expression was measured as luciferase activity and was also set to 1 for the same data point. The data points indicate the highest ampicillin concentration on which growth occurred, while the lowest concentration on which no growth was observed is indicated by error bars. Shapes that are half grey and half black indicate identical data points for both wild type and StEP-13. 1 mM m-toluate was added to all samples, cyclohexanone concentrations leading to the measured XylS expression levels (from left to right): 0, 0.25, 0.5, 1 and 2 mM, respectively.

The results presented above might indicate that expression from Pm could not be stimulated more by further increasing the XylS expression. We have on the other hand observed that 2 mM cyclohexanone is not so far from concentrations that have observable negative effects on cell growth [34], and we therefore wanted to create conditions at which XylS expression could be increased further without using near-toxic concentrations of cyclohexanone. In a parallel ongoing project we had observed that the expression level from the Pb promoter is, like Pm, very sensitive to the amounts of its regulator, ChnR. This was taken advantage of by substituting the chnR native promoter with constitutive promoters from the Registry of Standard Biological Parts, which were identified by a library screening [35]. Two promising variants were used to drive chnR expression in derivatives of pFZ2B1, namely pFZ2B2 and pFZ2B3, such that XylS expression could be controlled by cyclohexanone, as above, but hopefully at higher levels. As expected this resulted in increased XylS expression (measured as luciferase activity), up to 50-fold (pFZ2B3) above the maximum for pFZ2B1. In spite of this, the expression from Pm (in pFS15) was not higher than when pFZ2B1 was used for expression of XylS (Figure 4a,c and d, grey squares).

thumbnailFigure 4. Effects of XylS expression variations on induced and uninduced Pm activity. Upper host ampicillin tolerance levels as a function of the expression level of XylS in the absence (white squares) and presence (grey squares) of Pm induction (0/1 mM m-toluate). The shape that is half grey and half white represents an identical data point for both induced and uninduced. Relative expression from Pm and relative XylS expression were determined in the same way as described in Figure 3. The data points were collected from cells containing the Pm-bearing plasmid pFS15 in all cases and a: pFZ2B1, inducer concentrations as in Figure 3 (the grey data points are the same as the corresponding points in Figure 3); b: pET16.xylS, 0 mM IPTG; c: pFZ2B2, 0.25 and 0.5 mM cyclohexanone (from left to right); d: pFZ2B3, 0.25 and 0.5 mM cyclohexanone (from left to right); e: pET16.xylS, 0.5 mM IPTG.

For studies of expression from Pm in the absence of m-toluate (see further down) we also expressed xylS from the very strong bacteriophage T7 promoter (in plasmid pET16.xylS), heavily used for recombinant protein production. Activation of the T7 promoter requires the presence of T7 RNAP, and its production is induced by isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG). In the presence of this inducer XylS expression (measured as luciferase activity) was increased about five-fold compared to the maximum achieved by pFZ2B3, but the corresponding host tolerance to ampicillin did not increase any further (Figure 4e). Since we know that the ampicillin tolerance of the host can be increased to much higher levels by other means [28] we concluded that by using pFS15 as target plasmid for XylS, expression of the reporter (bla) downstream of Pm cannot be increased beyond the identified maximum (3500 μg mL-1) by enhancing production of XylS.

The XylS variant StEP-13 stimulates expression from Pm to the same maximum level as wild type XylS

In a previous study in our laboratory variants of xylS were isolated that resulted in strongly stimulated expression from Pm[10]. One such variant (StEP-13), which contains five amino acid substitutions (F3Y, I50T, F97L, E195G, M196T [10]) and originated from a combination of error-prone PCR and DNA shuffling procedures, was subjected to a comparative analysis with wild type xylS. This was done by first substituting the wild type xylS in pFS7 with the variant gene. Both xylS transcript amounts and luciferase activity were found to be the same for the resulting plasmid as for pFS7 (data not shown), indicating that the XylS expression level was not affected by the mutations in StEP-13. Thus it was concluded that StEP-13 increases expression from Pm via modified functionality of the protein.

To study expression from Pm as a function of expression of StEP-13, this particular variant was placed under control of the Pb promoter in plasmids analogous to pFZ2B1 and pFZ2B3 (pFZ2BX.StEP-13) and transformed into cells also containing pFS15. At low regulator expression levels cells with StEP-13, as expected, conferred an in general higher ampicillin tolerance than cells with wild type XylS (see Figure 3, grey and black squares). More interestingly, the same maximum level of resistance as for wild type XylS was observed, albeit it was reached at lower regulator concentrations. No changes in maximum resistance were found for host cells containing pFZ2B3.StEP-13 either (data not shown). This implies that the variant StEP-13 increases expression from Pm only at sub-saturating concentrations. All mutations in StEP-13 are situated in its N-terminal domain, while the C-terminal domain is involved in DNA binding. Thus it is reasonable to assume that StEP-13 acts either via better inducer binding, increased dimerization (which also can be a consequence of better inducer binding), stronger interaction with the host RNAP or a combination of these. Improved inducer binding could be excluded as single explanation for the phenotype of StEP-13, as the variant increases expression from Pm quite significantly also in the absence of m-toluate (data not shown).

The observed maximum expression level from Pm is not caused by saturation of available XylS target DNA binding sites

One way of explaining the observed maximum expression level is to assume that at some threshold value the XylS amounts in the cells are sufficient to saturate all the corresponding binding sites upstream of Pm. The behavior of StEP-13 could then be explained by a stronger affinity of the variant for binding to Pm (for example via improved dimerization), which would lead to a saturation of all binding sites at lower XylS expression levels.

This hypothesis would lead to the assumption that it might be possible to increase expression from Pm further simply by raising the copy number of the XylS target plasmid, pFSF15, which can be done by introducing specific point mutations in the gene encoding the replication initiation protein, TrfA. The positive correlation between plasmid copy number and level of recombinant protein expression is well established, and we have also used it specifically for Pm in mini-RK2 plasmids [23-25,36]. However, in previous applications the level of XylS expression was not taken into consideration and in all reported experiments the number of xylS copies was increased equally to the number of Pm. The trfA variant cop271 leads to 3-4-fold increased plasmid copy number compared to its wild type equivalent (4–8 copies per chromosome) [37]. This variant was integrated into pFS15 (generating pFS15.271) and transformed into cells, which already harbored pFZ2B1 or pFZ2B1.StEP-13. Host ampicillin tolerance was then monitored as a function of XylS expression (luciferase activity), and the previously observed maximum ampicillin tolerance level was found to increase only marginally, both for wild type XylS and StEP-13, and much less than in proportion to the expected increase in XylS binding sites.

The maximum ampicillin tolerance level also leveled out at similar XylS expression levels as with the wild type copy number (Figure 3, circles). Based on this we concluded that at maximum expression from pFS15 the limiting factor is not the number of target DNA molecules for XylS binding. This is also in agreement with previously published studies, in which the authors concluded that the interactions between XylS and Pm are too weak to lead to complete saturation [21]. Since the number of target DNA molecules did not appear to limit the maximum expression level from Pm we reasoned that more likely some property of XylS was causing the apparent saturation of the system at a certain concentration of this regulator.

In the presence of very high XylS concentrations expression from Pm can reach the upper maximum level in the absence of inducer

It is known that Pm looses its inducibility at high levels of XylS expression [21,30]. As we now had a way of varying and semi-quantitatively measuring XylS concentrations we could also evaluate the response in the absence of Pm inducer (Figure 4, white squares). In the absence of both m-toluate and cyclohexanone cells with pFZ2B1 and pFS15 did not tolerate significantly more ampicillin than cells without any plasmid. As expected, the activation of the Pm promoter was less sensitive to the presence of cyclohexanone than to the presence of m-toluate. This implies that the induction ratio of the system becomes higher as a function of XylS expression levels, up to the point where the maximum expression is observed. A maximum induction ratio of about 700 is reached at this point (about five times more XylS expression than in the absence of cyclohexanone). Interestingly, above this level expression from Pm in the absence of m-toluate continued to increase as a function of XylS expression levels, and at the highest production achievable with the available production tools (induced T7 promoter, relative XylS expression about 850), the maximum ampicillin tolerance of the host cells was at the same level as in the presence of inducer (Figure 4e).

XylS is produced from the T7 promoter mainly in an insoluble form

Based on the luciferase activity measurements over 800 times more XylS was expressed from the T7 promoter than from Ps2. If previous estimates of about 200 molecules per cell [5] are reasonably close to the true value, simple calculations indicated that an over 800-fold increase would yield a band directly visible on SDS-PAGE. A bacterial cell culture containing plasmid pET16.xylS was split into two such that one was induced by IPTG (0.5 mM), the other was not. Cells were harvested by centrifugation, lysed and split into a soluble and an insoluble fraction by centrifugation and the resulting samples were separated on an SDS-PAGE gel. Inspection of the band patterns (Figure 5) clearly demonstrated a unique and strong band in only the sample from the induced insoluble fraction. The distance of migration also matched to the expected position for XylS (36 kDa). The weaker band representing a similar size protein in the insoluble fraction of the uninduced culture seems to originate from a host-derived protein, as the same band was observed for samples from cells containing plasmid without xylS both in the presence and absence of inducer (data not shown). Thus, the vast majority of the XylS protein expressed from pET16.xylS is produced in an aggregated and presumably inactive form.

thumbnailFigure 5. SDS-PAGE gel for XylS produced from the T7 promoter. Samples were crude bacterial lysates from cells containing vector pET16b.xylS, grown in the presence or absence of inducer. Samples were split into soluble and insoluble fractions. Sizes of the protein ladder in kDa are given on the left site.

Model for activation of Pm by XylS

The observations reported here are consistent with and extend previous knowledge related to XylS function, and together they support the following model:

In the absence of m-toluate XylS is mainly present in a monomeric state, which probably is not able to activate Pm, while in the presence of m-toluate an unknown fraction of these monomers are converted to dimers, which activate transcription from Pm[5,6]. At low XylS concentrations formation of active dimers probably depends on m-toluate concentrations (Figure 6a), and this assumption can explain the well known fact that expression from Pm correlates with the concentration of inducer at fixed levels of XylS expression (usually from Ps2). In contrast, above a certain threshold value for XylS expression (illustrated in Figure 6b) the activity from Pm does not increase any further, and this can be explained by formation of XylS in a third state, as aggregated and not active molecules (Figure 6c). Alternatively, the threshold value might also be caused by saturation of the Pm targets available in the cell. However, this explanation does not fit with the observation that introduction of more Pm copies does not lead to a corresponding stimulation of expression even if total XylS levels are increased beyond the threshold value (Figure 3). Therefore, the upper maximum level of active dimers in the cells seems to be the result of inherent properties of the XylS molecule itself.

thumbnailFigure 6. Visualization of the hypothesis explaining XylS behaviour at various intracellular concentrations. The numbers of DNA or XylS molecules are not meant to represent the actual numbers in the cells. Only aggregates formed from active dimers of the protein are considered. At low XylS concentrations a certain percentage of the dimerized XylS molecules will activate transcription (a); the amount of activated Pm promoters will increase proportionally to XylS amounts up to a certain treshold value (b); when the threshold value is exceeded, XylS dimers will aggregate and become inactive, while the amount of active dimers remains constant (c). For StEP-13 a higher percentage of XylS molecules will dimerize at low XylS concentrations, resulting in more transcribed DNA (d); when the saturating concentration for wild type XylS is reached, there will already be some aggregation of dimers in case of StEP-13 (e), and as for wild type this will increase further as more XylS is expressed (f). In the absence of m-toluate, only a very small fraction of the XylS molecules will form dimers and these will activate transcription from Pm, aggregation does not start at the XylS expression levels depicted here (g, h, i).

The XylS variant StEP-13 is interesting in that it was previously found to strongly stimulate expression levels from Pm, compared to the wild type XylS [10]. In the referred study the regulator was expressed from Ps2, now known to produce only sub-saturating concentrations of XylS with respect to activation of Pm. It is therefore interesting that the experiments reported here show that when the expression level of StEP-13 was increased the maximum out-put from Pm was near the same as for wild type XylS. According to the reasoning above this seems to mean that StEP-13 is not able to form higher concentrations of active dimers than wild type XylS, but it reaches the maximum at lower inducer (m-toluate) or regulator concentrations (Figure 6d-e). StEP-13 was generated by complex mutagenesis procedures that may have changed its functional properties in more than one way. This prediction fits with the observation that it responds more efficiently to low inducer concentrations, while it is also more active in the absence of m-toluate. Both observations are in agreement with an inherently more efficient ability to form dimers, both in the absence (see below) and presence of m-toluate. This could involve higher affinity for the inducer, but no change in the properties related to formation of higher level aggregates from XylS dimers. Thus, more of the dimers would form aggregates at lower total XylS concentrations for StEP-13 than for the wild type protein, while the maximum concentrations of active dimers would be unchanged (Figure 6e-f). Another possibility could be that each dimer interacts more efficiently with RNAP, but one might then predict that the maximum level of expression from Pm would also be increased compared to wild type XylS.

The behavior of XylS in the absence of inducer (m-toluate) can be explained by the same model (Figure 6g-i). Dimerization of the regulator is strongly stimulated in the presence of inducer, but a certain low fraction of XylS dimerizes also in the absence of inducer. However, much higher total concentrations of the regulator are required before the maximum dimer concentration is reached. As a consequence aggregation will also start at much higher XylS expression levels.

If this model holds true it leads to an interesting prediction that if one could mutagenize xylS, such that its protein product could form higher concentrations of active dimers (less aggregate formation), expression from Pm could be further stimulated.

A screening for such variants should probably be done under conditions of excessive amounts of XylS present in the cells, to make sure that the desired phenotype is actually detected. StEP-13 was identified while expressed from Ps2 (and thus at low levels), and other types of variants may then dominate the screening outcome.

Even though XylS is known to be produced at low levels from its natural Ps2 promoter [5] these small amounts are sufficient for successful applications of Pm in recombinant protein production [24,25]. The results reported here indicate that expression can be further stimulated by increasing the intracellular concentration of XylS, and by fine-tuning this level and expressing XylS in trans the induction ratio can also be maximized. As shown here this allowed for high expression levels while maintaining an induction ratio of 700-fold, which exceeds the reported induction ratios both reached by 5′-UTR variations [29] and by regulation of XylS expression by a promoter which is activated by the same inducer as Pm[31].

In earlier studies a linear correlation between the copy number of plasmids that carry the complete XylS/Pm system and expression levels from Pm has been observed [23-25]. It is common to assume that this well known effect is caused by increased dosage of the gene to be expressed, but for a given XylS/Pm-based system the results presented here indicate that it is the increased amounts of XylS that lead to more expression from Pm. Fortunately the performance of the XylS/Pm system is not limited exclusively by concentrations of XylS dimers, since expression from Pm can be drastically stimulated by using combinations of various types of mutations in the expression cassette [28].

Conclusions

The earlier reported complete loss of inducibility of Pm at high levels of XylS expression [21,30] can be explained by the existence of a maximum concentration of active dimers inside the cell. An increase in XylS amounts beyond the point at which this maximum concentration is reached will lead to the formation of inactive aggregates. For very high cell-internal XylS amounts the concentration of dimers will thus be the same under induced and uninduced conditions. These findings enable expression of the transcription factor at a level for which the induction ratio at Pm is maximized, which is of high importance for recombinant gene expression.

Methods

Strains and growth conditions

The main bacterial strain used as host in this study was Escherichia coli DH5α (Bethesda Research Laboratories), unless otherwise stated. The cells were cultivated at 37°C in Lysogeny Broth (LB) (10 g L-1 tryptone, 5 g L-1 yeast extract, and 5 g L-1 NaCl) or on Lysogeny Agar (LB broth with 20 g L-1 agar). Antibiotics concentrations used in this study were: kanamycin 50 μg mL-1, gentamicin 20 μg mL-1, and tetracycline 15 μg mL-1 (final concentration).

For luciferase enzyme assay measurements 10 mL of LB were inoculated from an overnight culture and grown at 37°C to an OD600 of 0.1 and then induced with 1 mM m-toluate. After induction cells were further incubated at 30°C for 4 hours, before samples were collected.

When the T7 promoter was used, Escherichia coli ER2566 (New England Biolabs) was used as a host. Growth conditions were similar to those of DH5α, but for induction IPTG was added to a final concentration of 0.5 mM.

For induction of the ChnR/Pb system, cyclohexanone was added at the concentrations indicated.

Standard DNA manipulations

All enzymes for DNA manipulations were purchased from New England Biolabs and applied as described by the manufacturers. Primers and oligonucleotides were purchased either from Eurofins MWG Operon or Sigma Genosys. Transformations in cloning experiments were performed with a modified RbCl protocol (Promega). For plasmid DNA purifications WizardPlus SV minipreps DNA purification kit (Promega) was used.

PCR-reactions were performed either by the QuikChange site-specific mutagenesis kit from Stratagene, the Expand high fidelity PCR system kit from Roche or the Phusion® High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase kit from New England Biolabs, according to the manufacturer’s recommendations.

Plasmid constructions and vector descriptions

The plasmid pTA13 [10] was used for construction of pFS7. This plasmid harbours the Pm promoter with bla as reporter gene and the gene coding for xylS behind the natural Ps2 promoter in combination with a minimal RK2 replicon. A new NdeI-site was introduced downstream of xylS by site-specific mutagenesis. The luc-gene was amplified from pKT1 [29] with NdeI- and AgeI- flanking ends and inserted downstream of xylS. The NdeI-site was removed in a subsequent step by cloning of a PCR-amplified NcoI-xylS-BbsI-fragment from pTA13 into the new vector. A spacer was inserted upstream of the overlapping stop-start codon by site-specific mutagenesis to eliminate the function of a potential Shine-Dalgarno site at the 3′-end of xylS. Different variants of xylS were inserted via site-specific mutagenesis or insertion of annealed oligonucleotides upon digestion with suitable enzymes.

For construction of pFZ2A, xylS and its Ps2 promoter were PCR-amplified with AgeI- and EcoRI-flanking sites from pTA13 [10] and inserted into pBBR1-MCS-5 [33].

To obtain pFZ2B1 the Pb promoter part of pMS119 delta chnE[34] was PCR-amplified with BstZ171- and NdeI- flanking ends and cloned into pTA16 [28]. The chnR part of pMS119 delta chnE was PCR-amplified with AgeI- and SacI-flanking ends and integrated into the plasmid which already contained the Pb promoter. The resulting plasmid was named pRL17A. xylS was cloned behind the Pb promoter in this plasmid by digestion with KpnI and NcoI. An XhoI-BamHI-fragment was then cloned into vector pBBR1-MCS-5 [33], resulting in plasmid pFZ2B1.

In pFZ2B2 and pFZ2B3 the promoter in front of the gene chnR, coding for the regulator protein of Pb in pFZ2B1, was exchanged by two of the constitutive promoters (Anderson-collection, BBa_J23105 = A, BBa_J23103 = B) from the Registry of Standard Biological Parts [35]. For this one-step sequence- and ligation-independent cloning [38] was used. The two promoters increase levels of ChnR and thus result in stimulated expression from Pb (unpublished results).

pET16b.xylS is a plasmid based on pET16b (Novagen), where the ampicillin resistance gene was exchanged by a tetracycline resistance gene and xylS was inserted as NdeI-BamHI fragment behind the T7 promoter.

pFS15 is a derivative of pTA13, where xylS has been removed by digestion with AgeI and SacI and insertion of a short linker.

Test of XylS expression via host ampicillin tolerance

To monitor changes in XylS expression indirectly, bla under control of the Pm promoter was used as a reporter gene. Higher expression from Pm leads to increased β-lactamase production and corresponding host ampicillin tolerance in a nearly linear relationship with the ampicillin concentrations used in this study [32]. Changes in XylS expression will consequently lead to varying levels of expression from Pm in the presence of m-toluate, which can easily be characterized by simply plating cells on agar medium supplied with a gradient of increasing levels of ampicillin. Thus the levels of bla-expression will indirectly reflect the level of XylS being expressed. For ampicillin tolerance testing cultures were grown in LB medium in 96-well plates (at least three replicates per sample) overnight, diluted in fresh LB (1:104), plated on agar medium with a pin replicator, and incubated at 30°C for 48 hours. The plates were then inspected visually. The highest ampicillin concentration on which growth occurred for the majority of the replicates was treated as maximum ampicillin tolerance, while the lowest concentration in test at which no growth was observable is indicated as error bar in the corresponding figures. All ampicillin tolerance testing experiments were performed at least twice. Ampicillin concentrations varied from 5 μg mL-1 to 4500 μg mL-1.

Test of XylS expression levels using a synthetic operon and luciferase assay

XylS amounts could be measured more directly via luciferase activity in all constructs based on pFS7. Luciferase activity was measured using the Luciferase Assay System from Promega, according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The luminometer used was a GloMax 20/20 (Promega). Strains were grown as described above.

RNA isolation, cDNA synthesis and qRT-PCR

Transcript amounts were determined by two-step quantitative real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). RNAqueous (Ambion) was used for total RNA isolation. Isolated RNA was treated with Turbo DNAse (Ambion) and reverse transcription was performed using a first-strand cDNA synthesis kit with random pd(N)6 primers (Amersham Biosciences). PCR was carried out in the presence of Power SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) using a 7500 Real Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems). During PCR samples were heated to 95°C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of amplification (95°C for 15 s; 60°C for 1 min). Results were analysed by 7500 system software v1.3 using the 2-∆∆CT method [39]. Primers were designed using Primer Express software (Applied Biosystems). For xylS primers 5′-TGTTATCATCTGCAAATAATACTCAAAGG-3′ and 5′-GCCCGGCGCAAAATAGT-3′ were used. 16S rRNA was used as endogenous control with the primer pair 5′-ATTGACGTTACCCGCAGAAGAA-3′ and 5′-GCTTGCACCCTCCGTATTACC-3′.

Protein analysis by SDS-PAGE

For SDS-PAGE analysis cells were grown in a volume of 25 mL. Cultures containing plasmid pET16b.xylS were induced with 0.5 mM IPTG or grown in the absence of inducer. After centrifugation the pellets were washed in 0.9% NaCl. 100 mg pellet (wet weight) were resuspended in 0.5 mL lysis buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.0, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0, 20% sucrose), 1 mg lysozyme and 62.5 U mL-1 benzonase nuclease (Sigma) were added and samples were left with shaking at room temperature for 2 hours. After centrifugation (13.000 rpm, 8 min) the supernatant was used as soluble fraction, while the pellet was resuspended in 0.5 mL SDS-PAGE running buffer, giving the insoluble fraction. Protein gels were run under denaturing conditions using ClearPAGE 10% gels and ClearPAGE SDS-R Run buffer (C.B.S. Scientific) followed by staining with Coomassie Brilliant blue R-250 (Merck).

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

All authors were involved in the experimental design and FZ and RL stood for the practical execution. All authors contributed to the writing of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

References

  1. Brautaset T, Lale R, Valla S: Positively regulated bacterial expression systems.

    Microb Biotechnol 2009, 2:15-30. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  2. Mergulhão FJM, Monteiro GA, Cabral JMS, Taipa MA: Design of bacterial vector systems for the production of recombinant proteins in Escherichia coli.

    Microbiol Biotechnol 2004, 14:1-14. OpenURL

  3. Ramos JL, Marques S, Timmis KN: Transcriptional control of the Pseudomonas TOL plasmid catabolic operons is achieved through an interplay of host factors and plasmid-encoded regulators.

    Annu Rev Microbiol 1997, 51:341-373. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  4. Gallegos MT, Marques S, Ramos JL: Expression of the TOL plasmid xylS gene in Pseudomonas putida occurs from a σ70-dependent promoter or from σ70- and σ54-dependent tandem promoters according to the compound used for growth.

    J Bacteriol 1996, 178:2356-2361. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  5. Dominguez-Cuevas P, Marin P, Busby S, Ramos JL, Marques S: Roles of effectors in XylS-dependent transcription activation: intramolecular domain derepression and DNA binding.

    J Bacteriol 2008, 190:3118-3128. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  6. Ruiz R, Marques S, Ramos JL: Leucines 193 and 194 at the N-terminal domain of the XylS protein, the positive transcriptional regulator of the TOL meta-cleavage pathway, are involved in dimerization.

    J Bacteriol 2003, 185:3036-3041. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  7. Schleif R: AraC protein, regulation of the L-arabinose operon in Escherichia coli, and the light switch mechanism of AraC action.

    FEMS Microbiol Rev 2010, 34:779-796. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  8. Schleif R: AraC protein: a love-hate relationship.

    Bioessays 2003, 25:274-282. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  9. Dominguez-Cuevas P, Marin P, Marques S, Ramos JL: XylS-Pm promoter interactions through two helix-turn-helix motifs: identifying XylS residues important for DNA binding and activation.

    J Mol Biol 2008, 375:59-69. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  10. Vee Aune TE, Bakke I, Drablos F, Lale R, Brautaset T, Valla S: Directed evolution of the transcription factor XylS for development of improved expression systems.

    Microb Biotechnol 2010, 3:38-47. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  11. Michan C, Kessler B, De Lorenzo V, Timmis KN, Ramos JL: XylS domain interactions can be deduced from intraallelic dominance in double mutants of Pseudomonas putida.

    Mol Gen Genet 1992, 235:406-412. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  12. Ruiz R, Ramos JL: Residues 137 and 153 at the N terminus of the XylS protein influence the effector profile of this transcriptional regulator and the sigma factor used by RNA polymerase to stimulate transcription from its cognate promoter.

    J Biol Chem 2002, 277:7282-7286. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  13. Gallegos MT, Marques S, Ramos JL: The TACAN4TGCA motif upstream from the -35 region in the σ70S-dependent Pm promoter of the TOL plasmid is the minimum DNA segment required for transcription stimulation by XylS regulators.

    J Bacteriol 1996, 178:6427-6434. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  14. Gonzalez-Perez MM, Ramos JL, Gallegos MT, Marques S: Critical nucleotides in the upstream region of the XylS-dependent TOL meta-cleavage pathway operon promoter as deduced from analysis of mutants.

    J Biol Chem 1999, 274:2286-2290. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  15. Gonzalez-Perez MM, Marques S, Dominguez-Cuevas P, Ramos JL: XylS activator and RNA polymerase binding sites at the Pm promoter overlap.

    FEBS Lett 2002, 519:117-122. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  16. Dominguez-Cuevas P, Ramos JL, Marques S: Sequential XylS-CTD binding to the Pm promoter induces DNA bending prior to activation.

    J Bacteriol 2010, 192:2682-2690. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  17. Kaldalu N, Toots U, de Lorenzo V, Ustav M: Functional domains of the TOL plasmid transcription factor XylS.

    J Bacteriol 2000, 182:1118-1126. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  18. Ruiz R, Ramos JL, Egan SM: Interactions of the XylS regulators with the C-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase α subunit influence the expression level from the cognate Pm promoter.

    FEBS Lett 2001, 491:207-211. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  19. Ruiz R, Ramos JL: Residues 137 and 153 of XylS influence contacts with the C-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase α subunit.

    Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2001, 287:519-521. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  20. Michan C, Zhou L, Gallegos MT, Timmis KN, Ramos JL: Identification of critical amino-terminal regions of XylS. The positive regulator encoded by the TOL plasmid.

    J Biol Chem 1992, 267:22897-22901. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  21. Kessler B, Herrero M, Timmis KN, de Lorenzo V: Genetic evidence that the XylS regulator of the Pseudomonas TOL meta operon controls the Pm promoter through weak DNA-protein interactions.

    J Bacteriol 1994, 176:3171-3176. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  22. Blatny JM, Brautaset T, Winther-Larsen HC, Haugan K, Valla S: Construction and use of a versatile set of broad-host-range cloning and expression vectors based on the RK2 replicon.

    Appl Environ Microbiol 1997, 63:370-379. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  23. Blatny JM, Brautaset T, Winther-Larsen HC, Karunakaran P, Valla S: Improved broad-host-range RK2 vectors useful for high and low regulated gene expression levels in gram-negative bacteria.

    Plasmid 1997, 38:35-51. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  24. Sletta H, Nedal A, Aune TEV, Hellebust H, Hakvåg S, Aune R, Ellingsen TE, Valla S, Brautaset T: Broad-host-range plasmid pJB658 can be used for industrial-level production of a secreted host-toxic single-chain antibody fragment in Escherichia coli.

    Appl Environ Microbiol 2004, 70:7033-7039. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  25. Sletta H, Tondervik A, Hakvag S, Aune TE, Nedal A, Aune R, Evensen G, Valla S, Ellingsen TE, Brautaset T: The presence of N-terminal secretion signal sequences leads to strong stimulation of the total expression levels of three tested medically important proteins during high-cell-density cultivations of Escherichia coli.

    Appl Environ Microbiol 2007, 73:906-912. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  26. Bakke I, Berg L, Aune TE, Brautaset T, Sletta H, Tondervik A, Valla S: Random mutagenesis of the Pm promoter as a powerful strategy for improvement of recombinant-gene expression.

    Appl Environ Microbiol 2009, 75:2002-2011. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  27. Berg L, Lale R, Bakke I, Burroughs N, Valla S: The expression of recombinant genes in Escherichia coli can be strongly stimulated at the transcript production level by mutating the DNA-region corresponding to the 5′-untranslated part of mRNA.

    Microb Biotechnol 2009, 2:379-389. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  28. Zwick F, Lale R, Valla S: Strong stimulation of recombinant protein production in Escherichia coli by combining stimulatory control elements in an expression cassette.

    Microb Cell Fact 2012, 11:133. PubMed Abstract | BioMed Central Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  29. Lale R, Berg L, Stüttgen F, Netzer R, Stafsnes M, Brautaset T, Vee Aune TE, Valla S: Continuous control of the flow in biochemical pathways through 5′ untranslated region sequence modifications in mRNA expressed from the broad-host-range promoter Pm.

    Appl Environ Microbiol 2011, 77:2648-2655. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  30. Mermod N, Ramos JL, Bairoch A, Timmis KN: The xylS gene positive regulator of TOL plasmid pWWO: identification, sequence analysis and overproduction leading to constitutive expression of meta cleavage operon.

    Mol Gen Genet 1987, 207:349-354. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  31. Cebolla A, Sousa C, de Lorenzo V: Rational design of a bacterial transcriptional cascade for amplifying gene expression capacity.

    Nucleic Acids Res 2001, 29:759-766. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  32. Uhlin BE, Nordstrom K: R plasmid gene dosage effects in Escherichia coli K-12: Copy mutants of the R plasmic R1drd-19.

    Plasmid 1977, 1:1-7. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  33. Steigedal M, Valla S: The Acinetobacter sp. chnB promoter together with its cognate positive regulator ChnR is an attractive new candidate for metabolic engineering applications in bacteria.

    Metab Eng 2008, 10:121-129. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  34. Kovach ME, Elzer PH, Hill DS, Robertson GT, Farris MA, Roop RM II, Peterson KM: Four new derivatives of the broad-host-range cloning vector pBBR1MCS, carrying different antibiotic-resistance cassettes.

    Gene 1995, 166:175-176. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  35. Registry of Standard Biological Parts.

    [http://partsregistry.org/Promoters/Catalog/Anderson webcite]

    OpenURL

  36. Balzer S, Kucharova V, Megerle J, Lale R, Brautaset T, Valla S: A comparative analysis of the properties of regulated promoter systems commonly used for recombinant gene expression in Escherichia coli.

    Microb Cell Fact 2013, 12:26-39. PubMed Abstract | BioMed Central Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  37. Durland RH, Toukdarian A, Fang F, Helinski DR: Mutations in the trfA replication gene of the broad-host-range plasmid RK2 result in elevated plasmid copy numbers.

    J Bacteriol 1990, 172:3859-3867. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  38. Jeong JY, Yim HS, Ryu JY, Lee HS, Lee JH, Seen DS, Kang SG: One-step sequence- and ligation-independent cloning as a rapid and versatile cloning method for functional genomics studies.

    Appl Environ Microbiol 2012, 78:5440-5443. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  39. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔCT Method.

    Methods 2001, 25:402-408. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL