Figure 2.

Between animal variation in alignments to contigs. a) Percentage of reads that map back to assembled contigs of different sizes. b) Distribution of reads that map to the 14 contigs annotated in Figure 1. c) Distribution of reads that map to the 14 contigs annotated in Figure 1 normalised to a total of 100%. d) Distribution of reads that map to the 100 most abundant (in our dataset) contigs assembled from [8]. e) Principle component analysis of reads that map to the 50 most abundant contigs assembled from [8]. PC1 (X axis) explains 15.42% of the variation, PC2 (Y axis) explains 12.73% of the variation.

Ross et al. BMC Microbiology 2013 13:242   doi:10.1186/1471-2180-13-242
Download authors' original image