BMC Genomics
|
Viewing options:Associated material:Related literature:- Articles citing this article
- Other articles by authors
- Related articles/pages
Tools:Post to:
|
Methodology articleMismatch oligonucleotides in human and yeast: guidelines for probe design on tiling microarraysMichael Seringhaus1 , Joel Rozowsky1 , Thomas Royce2 , Ugrappa Nagalakshmi3 , Justin Jee1 , Michael Snyder1,3 and Mark Gerstein1,2,4  1
Department of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA 2
Program in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA 3
Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA 4
Department of Computer Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA author email corresponding author email
BMC Genomics 2008,
9:635doi:10.1186/1471-2164-9-635
|
|
| Published: |
31 December 2008 |
Abstract
Background
Mismatched oligonucleotides are widely used on microarrays to differentiate specific from nonspecific hybridization. While many experiments rely on such oligos, the hybridization behavior of various degrees of mismatch (MM) structure has not been extensively studied. Here, we present the results of two large-scale microarray experiments on S. cerevisiae and H. sapiens genomic DNA, to explore MM oligonucleotide behavior with real sample mixtures under tiling-array conditions.
Results
We examined all possible nucleotide substitutions at the central position of 36-nucleotide probes, and found that nonspecific binding by MM oligos depends upon the individual nucleotide substitutions they incorporate: C→A, C→G and T→A (yielding purine-purine mispairs) are most disruptive, whereas A→X were least disruptive. We also quantify a marked GC skew effect: substitutions raising probe GC content exhibit higher intensity (and vice versa). This skew is small in highly-expressed regions (± 0.5% of total intensity range) and large (± 2% or more) elsewhere. Multiple mismatches per oligo are largely additive in effect: each MM added in a distributed fashion causes an additional 21% intensity drop relative to PM, three-fold more disruptive than adding adjacent mispairs (7% drop per MM).
Conclusion
We investigate several parameters for oligonucleotide design, including the effects of each central nucleotide substitution on array signal intensity and of multiple MM per oligo. To avoid GC skew, individual substitutions should not alter probe GC content. RNA sample mixture complexity may increase the amount of nonspecific hybridization, magnify GC skew and boost the intensity of MM oligos at all levels. |