Log on / register
Feedback | Support | My details
Open AccessHighly AccessMethodology article

Systematic interpretation of microarray data using experiment annotations

Kurt Fellenberg1 email, Christian H Busold1 email, Olaf Witt2,3 email, Andrea Bauer1 email, Boris Beckmann1 email, Nicole C Hauser4 email, Marcus Frohme1 email, Stefan Winter5 email, Jürgen Dippon5 email and Jörg D Hoheisel1 email

Department of Functional Genome Analysis, German Cancer Research Center, PO 101949, D-69009 Heidelberg, Germany

Department of Pediatrics I, University of Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, D-37075 Göttingen, Germany

Experimental Pediatric Oncology, German Cancer Research Center, PO 101949, D-69009 Heidelberg, Germany

Fraunhofer IGB, Nobelstr. 12, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany

Institute for Stochastics and Applications, University of Stuttgart, Pfaffenwaldring 57, D-70569 Stuttgart, Germany

author email corresponding author email

BMC Genomics 2006, 7:319doi:10.1186/1471-2164-7-319

Published: 20 December 2006

Abstract

Background

Up to now, microarray data are mostly assessed in context with only one or few parameters characterizing the experimental conditions under study. More explicit experiment annotations, however, are highly useful for interpreting microarray data, when available in a statistically accessible format.

Results

We provide means to preprocess these additional data, and to extract relevant traits corresponding to the transcription patterns under study. We found correspondence analysis particularly well-suited for mapping such extracted traits. It visualizes associations both among and between the traits, the hereby annotated experiments, and the genes, revealing how they are all interrelated. Here, we apply our methods to the systematic interpretation of radioactive (single channel) and two-channel data, stemming from model organisms such as yeast and drosophila up to complex human cancer samples. Inclusion of technical parameters allows for identification of artifacts and flaws in experimental design.

Conclusion

Biological and clinical traits can act as landmarks in transcription space, systematically mapping the variance of large datasets from the predominant changes down toward intricate details.


© 1999-2010 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. Part of Springer Science+Business Media.