TE-array—a high throughput tool to study transposon transcription
1 The Institute of Genetic Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 North Broadway, Miller Research Building (MRB) Room 469, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
2 The Lieber Institute for Brain Development, The Johns Hopkins Medical Campus, Baltimore, MD, USA
3 Molecular Biology and Genetics, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 North Broadway, Broadway Research Building, Room 339, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
4 Department of Oncology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Bunting Blaustein Cancer Research Building, Suite 4M51, 1650 Orleans St, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
5 Department of Biostatistics, The Bloomberg School of Public Health, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
6 Department of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
7 Department of Urology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
8 High Throughput Biology Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
9 Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
BMC Genomics 2013, 14:869 doi:10.1186/1471-2164-14-869Published: 10 December 2013
Additional file 1: Figure S1:
(Left) Array design. Mouse or human specific TE consensus sequences were tiled with 60 bp probes. (1) TE families with consensus sequence less than 1 kb long were tiled every 14-15 bp with overlapping probes; (2) those greater than 1 kb long were tiled with probes sequentially offset in 30- 45 bp increments. (Right) Poly-A RNA (strand 1) was reverse transcribed to double stranded cDNA using MMLV RT (strands 2 and 3). T7 promoter was ligated to the 3′ end corresponding to poly-A, and T7 was used to generate single stranded, labeled cRNA. RNA was labeled using Cy-dye labeled Cytosine (strand 4).
Format: JPEG Size: 468KB Download file
Additional file 2: Figure S2:
A) Technical replicates of the mouse N3D cell line. Four replicate TE-array hybridizations were performed with aliquots of RNA extracted from one cell culture. Plotted are pairwise correlations showing the behavior of all probes for each replicate type. B) Three technical replicates of RNA from the N1G cell line. C) Biological replicates. Four independent N3D cell cultures were expanded for RNA extraction and TE-array hybridization. D) Six biological replicates of N1G cells.
Format: PDF Size: 306KB Download file
This file can be viewed with: Adobe Acrobat Reader
Additional file 3: Table S1:
A: Replicates, B: Tissues.
Format: XLSX Size: 10KB Download file
Additional file 4: Figure S3:
Tissue specific gene expression. As a control for reverse transcription and hybridization conditions, 100 genes were chosen and an array probe placed in each gene exon. Shown are M value (log2 ratio) plots for two testis specific genes, Brdt (bromodomain testis-specific protein) (A) and Theg (testicular haploid expressed gene) (B).
Format: JPEG Size: 434KB Download file
Additional file 5: Figure S4:
Intra- and Inter-tissue clustering of TE-array and gene expression (GE) data. Multidimensional scaling applied to Euclidean distance was used to categorize tissues using A) TE-array and B) traditional gene expression microarray data.
Format: JPEG Size: 510KB Download file
Additional file 6: Table S2:
The Excel worksheet has 4 tabs corresponding to different versions of TE-array. Abbreviations denote the species (hs, Homo sapiens; mm, Mus musculus) and strand (as, antisense strand; ss sense strand) of the version. Each list provides the probe ID and its genomic copy number. Corresponding sequences can be downloaded from the manufacturer’s site.
Format: XLSX Size: 2MB Download file