Table 5 |
|||||
|
Summary of the performance of other state-of-the-art classifiers of mutations, either general or kinase-specific |
|||||
|
Method |
Scope |
Accuracy (%) |
Precision (%) |
Recall (%) |
MCC |
|
|
|||||
|
KinMut |
Kinase† |
83.3 |
60.0 |
75.2 |
0.6 |
|
SNPs&GO [18] |
Kinase† |
82.3 |
62.8 |
77.5 |
0.6 |
|
Torkamani [19] |
Kinase |
77.0 |
- |
- |
0.5 |
|
MutationAssessor [9] |
Kinase† |
53.8 |
41.6 |
95.6 |
0.5 |
|
SNAP [16] |
Kinase† |
49.4 |
34.0 |
93.1 |
0.4 |
|
SIFT [7] |
Kinase† |
77.6 |
37.8 |
27.9 |
0.2 |
|
SNPs&GO [18] |
Genome-wide |
82.0 |
83.0 |
78.0 |
0.6 |
|
MutationAssessor [9] |
Genome-wide |
79.0 |
- |
- |
- |
|
SNAP [16] |
Genome-wide |
78.2 |
76.7 |
80.2 |
- |
|
SIFT [7] |
Genome-wide |
68.3 |
66.1 |
56.5 |
0.3 |
|
|
|||||
|
Summary of the performance of other state-of-the-art classifiers of mutations, either general or kinase-specific. Performance was measured in terms of overall accuracy recall and the Matthews correlation coefficient. General methods with which the prediction corresponds to our dataset are marked with †. The remaining results for the classifiers displayed here were taken directly from their original publications |
|||||
|
Izarzugaza et al. BMC Genomics 2012 13(Suppl 4):S3 doi:10.1186/1471-2164-13-S4-S3 |
|||||