Figure 8.

An overall comparison between different promoter classes in each tissue. (A) tendency for a complementarity relationship between CG based and AT spike classes, (B) tendency for direct proportionality relationship of AT based – ATCG compact classes. (C) a combined relationship between AT less – CG less classes, both of complementarity and direct proportionality.

Gagniuc and Ionescu-Tirgoviste BMC Genomics 2012 13:512   doi:10.1186/1471-2164-13-512
Download authors' original image