Table 2 |
||
|
Results of the molecular docking simulations. |
||
|
Experiments |
Average FEB (Kcal/mol) |
Number of valid results |
|
|
||
|
NADH all runs |
-9.2 ± 4.5 |
11,284 |
|
NADH best FEB |
-12.9 ± 4.2 |
2,823 |
|
PIF all runs |
-9.1 ± 1.6 |
30,420 |
|
PIF best FEB |
-9.9 ± 0.6 |
3,042 |
|
TCL all runs |
-8.2 ± 1.3 |
28,370 |
|
TCL best FEB |
-8.9 ± 0.3 |
2,837 |
|
ETH all runs |
-6.4 ± 0.3 |
30,430 |
|
ETH best FEB |
-6.8 ± 0.3 |
3,043 |
|
|
||
|
The first column describes the ligands for each experiment and indicates the data size used to calculate the values in columns two and three. “all runs” refers to all docking runs. Its maximum value is 31,000. “best FEB” refers to the best estimated FEB for each set of simulations. Its maximum value is 3,100. The second column shows the average FEB (in Kcal/mol) and the third column the total number of valid results of each experiment. |
||
|
Machado et al. BMC Genomics 2010 11(Suppl 5):S6 doi:10.1186/1471-2164-11-S5-S6 |
||