Table 3 |
||||
|
Disruption of annotated coding regions by CREE |
||||
|
FA1090* |
CREE?† |
NCCP11945‡ |
CREE?† |
|
|
|
||||
|
previously reported: |
||||
|
NMA2121 |
not present |
n/a |
NGK_1900 |
Yes |
|
NMB0397 |
NGO1564** |
no |
NGK_1865/7 |
Yes |
|
cvaB |
unannotated†† |
yes |
NGK_0171 |
Yes |
|
NMA0059 |
unannotated |
yes |
NGK_2501 |
Yes |
|
NMA0530 |
NGO2162 |
no |
NGK_2641 |
No |
|
new from this study: |
||||
|
NGO0243 |
yes |
NGK_0377 |
Yes |
|
|
NGO2104 |
yes |
NGK_2573 |
Yes |
|
|
NGO1597 |
yes |
NGK_1901‡‡ |
No |
|
|
|
||||
|
* Locus annotation from N. gonorrhoeae strain FA1090 [GenBank: RefSeq NC_002946]. † Presence of a CREE. ‡ Locus annotation from N. gonorrhoeae strain NCCP11945 [GenBank: RefSeq NC_011035]. ¶Differences in annotation place this CREE 21 bp 5' of NGK_1900 rather than disrupting the CDS. ** This CDS disrupts the NMB0397 orthologue in this strain. †† The corresponding sequence in this strain has a 954 bp deletion relative to NGK_0171. ‡‡ This CDS is annotated on the reverse complement strand from NGO1597. By this annotation the site of CREE insertion would be 3' of the CDS. |
||||
|
Snyder et al. BMC Genomics 2009 10:70 doi:10.1186/1471-2164-10-70 |
||||
