Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Genetics and BioMed Central.

Open Access Highly Accessed Methodology article

Influence of genotyping error in linkage mapping for complex traits – an analytic study

Jérémie JP Lebrec*, Hein Putter, Jeanine J Houwing-Duistermaat and Hans C van Houwelingen

Author Affiliations

Department of Medical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Leiden University Medical Center, Postzone S-05-P, PO Box 9600 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Genetics 2008, 9:57  doi:10.1186/1471-2156-9-57

Published: 25 August 2008

Abstract

Background

Despite the current trend towards large epidemiological studies of unrelated individuals, linkage studies in families are still thoroughly being utilized as tools for disease gene mapping. The use of the single-nucleotide-polymorphisms (SNP) array technology in genotyping of family data has the potential to provide more informative linkage data. Nevertheless, SNP array data are not immune to genotyping error which, as has been suggested in the past, could dramatically affect the evidence for linkage especially in selective designs such as affected sib pair (ASP) designs. The influence of genotyping error on selective designs for continuous traits has not been assessed yet.

Results

We use the identity-by-descent (IBD) regression-based paradigm for linkage testing to analytically quantify the effect of simple genotyping error models under specific selection schemes for sibling pairs. We show, for example, that in extremely concordant (EC) designs, genotyping error leads to decreased power whereas it leads to increased type I error in extremely discordant (ED) designs. Perhaps surprisingly, the effect of genotyping error on inference is most severe in designs where selection is least extreme. We suggest a genomic control for genotyping errors via a simple modification of the intercept in the regression for linkage.

Conclusion

This study extends earlier findings: genotyping error can substantially affect type I error and power in selective designs for continuous traits. Designs involving both EC and ED sib pairs are fairly immune to genotyping error. When those designs are not feasible the simple genomic control strategy that we suggest offers the potential to deliver more robust inference, especially if genotyping is carried out by SNP array technology.