Table 4

QTLs with a LOD score passing the permutated threshold but lower than 3
QTL Location/LG Methods of QTL detection Position (cM) Length (cM) Closest marker MQM LODc LOD threshold

MQM

R2(%)

Additive effect
SX2009
Qnff.zaas-6 LG6 IM, MQM 28.3-35.4 7.1 Clm0438 2.96 1.9 13.2 0.83
Qnff.zaas-11 LG11 IM, MQM 30-35.1 5.1 1_1103 2.29 1.8 10.6 0.73
Qpn.zaas-3 LG3 IM, MQM 50.3-52.6 2.3 Clm0614 2.32 2.2 12.1 1.85
HN2010
Qfld.zaas-10a LG10 IM, MQMb 31.5-38.7 7.2 1_0981 2.4 2 11.4 0.59
Qnff.zaas-2 LG2 IM, MQM 8.8-12.3 3.5 Clm0053 2.28 2.2 11.7 0.44
Qpn.zaas-4 LG4 IM, MQM 7.7-9.0 1.3 1_1034 2.43 1.8 11.3 1.19
Qls.zaas-3 LG3 IM, MQM 64-67 3 1_0380 2.43 2 11.4 −0.32
Qls.zaas-7 LG7 IM, MQM 20.7-25.5 4.8 Clm0445 2.46 1.9 11.4 −0.32
SX2010c
Qfld.zaas-3 LG3 IM, MQM 93-94.1 1.1 Clm0269 2.33 2.3 10.7 0.6
Qfld.zaas-10 LG10 IM, MQM 31.5-42.6 11.1 1_0140 2.61 2 11.8 0.62

a FLD: days to first flowering, NFF: nodes to first flower, LS: leaf senescence, PN: pod number per plant.

b IM: interval mapping, MQM: multiple-QTL mode mapping.

c The trait of NFF not investigated in this experiment.

Only QTLs detectable by both IM and MQM were included.

Xu et al.

Xu et al. BMC Genetics 2013 14:4   doi:10.1186/1471-2156-14-4

Open Data