Table 4

Association and effects of SNP significant for ADG on BTA6 with meat quality and carcass traits in the discovery population of crossbred steers.

Adjusted Fat Thickness(cm)

Hot Carcass Weight (kg)

Ribeye Area (cm2)

Marbling (MSU)1

Slice Shear Force


Marker Name2

Minor Allele

Effect3

SE

P

Effect3

SE

P

Effect3

SE

P

Effect3

SE

P

Effect3

SE

P


83704_2344

A

-0.102

0.0245

3.8E-05

8.69

1.634

1.8E-07

1.99

0.3714

1.4E-07

-2.45

4.073

0.55

-0.060

0.149

0.69

83708_361

C

-0.095

0.0247

0.0001

7.84

1.648

2.7E-06

1.83

0.3748

1.4E-06

-2.86

4.110

0.49

-0.081

0.151

0.59

83712_1684

G

-0.086

0.0263

0.001

8.05

1.753

5.9E-06

1.83

0.3986

6.0E-06

-5.33

4.371

0.22

-0.012

0.160

0.94

83714_2244

G

-0.125

0.0250

9.2E-07

10.39

1.671

1.3E-09

2.33

0.3798

1.9E-09

-6.94

4.165

0.10

-0.031

0.153

0.84

83724_658

C

-0.096

0.0250

0.0002

8.25

1.671

1.2E-06

1.98

0.3801

3.1E-07

-4.23

4.168

0.31

-0.073

0.153

0.63

83730_778

A

-0.100

0.0271

0.0002

9.15

1.807

6.2E-07

2.20

0.4110

1.5E-07

-4.47

4.506

0.32

-0.086

0.166

0.60

83732_316

G

-0.097

0.0256

0.0002

8.10

1.711

3.0E-06

1.92

0.3890

1.2E-06

-3.27

4.266

0.44

-0.084

0.157

0.59

Hapmap24122-BTC-041153

G

-0.120

0.0236

5.3E-07

10.56

1.577

7.4E-11

2.43

0.3584

4.3E-11

-4.47

3.931

0.26

-0.075

0.144

0.60

Hapmap24041-BTC-041151

T

-0.119

0.0235

6.3E-07

10.38

1.570

1.2E-10

2.39

0.3569

6.9E-11

-3.83

3.914

0.33

-0.085

0.143

0.55

Hapmap31609-BTC-041148

A

-0.108

0.0232

4.7E-06

8.56

1.552

6.3E-08

2.02

0.3527

2.0E-08

-3.45

3.868

0.37

-0.10

0.142

0.48

Hapmap28154-BTC-0411345

C

-0.108

0.0235

5.4E-06

8.31

1.568

1.9E-07

1.87

0.3563

2.3E-07

-2.64

3.908

0.50

-0.084

0.143

0.56

Hapmap27082-BTC-041131

G

-0.108

0.0232

4.5E-06

8.59

1.553

5.6E-08

1.98

0.3527

3.6E-08

-3.93

3.869

0.31

-0.091

0.142

0.52

Hapmap26855-BTC-041123

G

-0.127

0.0244

2.8E-07

10.41

1.631

4.9E-10

2.12

0.3705

1.9E-08

-6.65

4.064

0.10

-0.056

0.149

0.71

Hapmap23341-BTC-041113

T

-0.114

0.0236

1.8E-06

10.16

1.575

3.2E-10

2.26

0.3579

6.7E-10

-4.34

3.925

0.27

-0.077

0.144

0.59

81441_243

G

0.112

0.0248

7.9E-06

-10.59

1.658

4.7E-10

-2.25

0.3766

5.2E-09

1.59

4.131

0.70

0.078

0.151

0.61

81435_188

C

-0.099

0.0231

2.2E-05

8.23

1.545

1.7E-07

1.71

0.3511

1.6E-06

-4.85

3.851

0.21

-0.087

0.141

0.54

Hapmap28589-BTC-041045

G

-0.130

0.0240

9.4E-08

10.63

1.601

1.0E-10

2.33

0.3640

4.3E-10

-5.86

3.992

0.14

-0.044

0.146

0.77

Hapmap33629-BTC-041038

T

-0.127

0.0245

3.6E-07

10.30

1.639

8.4E-10

2.10

0.3721

3.4E-08

-6.45

4.082

0.11

-0.065

0.149

0.66

81405_282

A

-0.130

0.0242

1.4E-07

10.84

1.619

7.2E-11

2.38

0.3679

3.1E-10

-5.61

4.035

0.17

-0.030

0.148

0.84

Hapmap33650-BTC-073421

C

0.054

0.0232

0.02

-7.26

1.546

3.7E-06

-1.35

0.3514

0.0001

5.01

3.854

0.19

0.043

0.141

0.76


1 MSU = Marbling score unit. 400 = Slight00, 500 = Small00, 600 = Modest00.

2 Name of publicly available markers from the following references: Van Tassell CP et al. [26], Bovine HapMap Consortium et al. [27], and Bovine Genome Sequencing and Analysis Consortium et al. [28].

3 Effects of phenotypes are displayed in the following units: AFT = cm, HCW = kg, REA = cm2, Marbling = MSU, and SSF = kg. The effects presented correspond to the minor allele.

4 Markers evaluated in Setoguchi et al. [8] and Eberlein [11].

5 Marker evaluated in Charolais and German Holstein population in Eberlein et al. [11].

Lindholm-Perry et al. BMC Genetics 2011 12:103   doi:10.1186/1471-2156-12-103

Open Data