Table 1 |
|||
|
haplotyping accuracy for the different compared methods |
|||
|
Haplotyping method and data |
correct haplotype (%) |
haplotype errors (%) |
unresolved cases (%) |
|
|
|||
|
AIL pedigree |
|||
|
GA- 0.95 |
95.10 |
0.20 |
4.80 |
|
GA- 0.5 |
97.10 |
2.60 |
0.15 |
|
Hapsim 1 |
96.70 |
3.30 |
0.00 |
|
Merlin 2 |
83.00 |
1.80 |
14.20 |
|
QTL-MAS pedigree |
|||
|
GA- 0.95 |
87.00 |
0.05 |
13.00 |
|
GA- 0.5 |
90.00 |
1.00 |
9.00 |
|
Hapsim 1 |
97.00 |
3.00 |
0.00 |
|
Merlin 2 |
95.00 |
1.30 |
3.70 |
|
|
|||
|
We compare three methods: our GA based method with high stringency (0.95), and low stringency (0.50), a deterministic method, and a likelihood based descent tree (Merlin), The results are given in percent of the non obvious heterozygous markers (non homozygous parents). 1Hernández-Sánchez and Knott (2009) [7] 2Abecasis et al (2002)[12] |
|||
|
Besnier and Carlborg BMC Genetics 2009 10:57 doi:10.1186/1471-2156-10-57 |
|||
