Table 3 |
|||||||||||
|
Characteristics* of the 12 microsatellite loci used in E. mongoz and E. fulvus |
|||||||||||
|
Locus |
E. mongoz at Anjamena |
E. mongoz |
E. fulvus |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
NI |
NA |
HO |
HE |
Fis |
SR |
NI |
NA |
SR |
NI |
NA |
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Em1 |
37 |
5 |
0.892 |
0.767 |
-0.165 |
161–175 |
107 |
8 |
161–199 |
53 |
17 |
|
Em2 |
37 |
3 |
0.162 |
0.153 |
-0.061 |
156–164 |
107 |
4 |
150–176 |
54 |
11 |
|
Em4 |
37 |
4 |
0.568 |
0.504 |
-0.129 |
146–158 |
107 |
5 |
142–160 |
55 |
8 |
|
Em5 |
37 |
2 |
0.270 |
0.444 |
0.395 |
172–176 |
107 |
3 |
170–180 |
55 |
6 |
|
Em7 |
37 |
6 |
0.649 |
0.729 |
0.112 |
129–147 |
107 |
7 |
129–151 |
55 |
9 |
|
Em8 |
37 |
6 |
0.703 |
0.719 |
0.023 |
159–177 |
107 |
9 |
143–175 |
55 |
12 |
|
Em9 |
37 |
4 |
0.432 |
0.437 |
0.011 |
171–183 |
106 |
7 |
169–197 |
53 |
13 |
|
Em11 |
37 |
4 |
0.541 |
0.534 |
-0.013 |
250–259 |
107 |
6 |
247–257 |
55 |
6 |
|
Em15 |
37 |
4 |
0.595 |
0.652 |
0.089 |
206–224 |
107 |
6 |
204–212 |
55 |
3 |
|
Lc1 |
37 |
5 |
0.757 |
0.672 |
-0.129 |
86–98 |
107 |
5 |
90–100 |
55 |
6 |
|
Lc8 |
35 |
5 |
0.429 |
0.393 |
-0.091 |
221–231 |
104 |
7 |
217–237 |
50 |
11 |
|
Efr09 |
37 |
4 |
0.622 |
0.542 |
-0.150 |
99–105 |
107 |
4 |
95–107 |
51 |
6 |
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Mean |
36.8 |
4.3 |
0.552 |
0.545 |
-0.009 |
106.7 |
5.9 |
53.8 |
9.0 |
||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
* NI = number of individuals genotyped; NA = number of alleles found; HO = observed heterozygosity; HE = expected heterozygosity; Fis = inbreeding coefficient; SR = size range of alleles in base positions |
|||||||||||
|
Pastorini et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2009 9:32 doi:10.1186/1471-2148-9-32 |
|||||||||||