|
Resolution: standard / high Figure 6.
NJ tree of RISP haplotypes from four focal regions for T. californicus. Tree is unrooted. Branches that were also supported by consensus trees of partial
parsimony analyses of these RISP haplotypes are indicated by an *. We were unable to complete a parsimony analysis
for the entire dataset but could complete analyses for pruned datasets to examine
relationships between regions. Secondarily, the relationships of haplotypes within
each region were separately analyzed using a parsimony method and compared to the
relationships obtained from the NJ analysis. Intragenic recombination and reticulation
of sequences within regions could make parsimony analyses difficult by yielding numerous
equally parsimonious trees.
Willett and Ladner BMC Evolutionary Biology 2009 9:139 doi:10.1186/1471-2148-9-139 |