Table 2 |
||
|
Relative migration rate values (Nm) between each population pair for the stepping-stone migration model along the South African coast. |
||
|
From Population |
To population |
Nm |
|
|
||
|
1 (Wooley's Pool) |
2 (Rooiels) |
0 (0–10) |
|
2 (Rooiels) |
1 (Wooley's Pool) |
60 (37–91) |
|
2 (Rooiels) |
3 (Gansbaai) |
1 (0.06–4.5) |
|
3 (Gansbaai) |
2 (Rooiels) |
201 (145–270) |
|
3 (Gansbaai) |
4 (Cape Agulhas) |
0 (0–4) |
|
4 (Cape Agulhas) |
3 (Gansbaai) |
47 (34–61) |
|
4 (Cape Agulhas) |
5 (Cape Infanta) |
2.5 (0.7–5.5) |
|
5 (Cape Infanta) |
4 (Cape Agulhas) |
143 (112–178) |
|
5 (Cape Infanta) |
6 (Jongensfontein) |
3.5 (2–5) |
|
6 (Jongensfontein) |
5 (Cape Infanta) |
46 (37–56) |
|
6 (Jongensfontein) |
7 (Herold's Bay) |
7 (5–8.5) |
|
7 (Herold's Bay) |
6 (Jongensfontein) |
22 (18–26) |
|
7 (Herold's Bay) |
8 (Knysna) |
21 (18–24) |
|
8 (Knysna) |
7 (Herold's Bay) |
15 (12–17) |
|
8 (Knysna) |
9 (Port Alfred) |
0 (0-0) |
|
9 (Port Alfred) |
8 (Knysna) |
1.5 (0.7–2.5) |
|
9 (Port Alfred) |
10 (Haga Haga) |
25 (14–39) |
|
10 (Haga Haga) |
9 (Port Alfred) |
39 (31–59) |
|
|
||
|
Values in brackets represent the 0.05% confidence values. |
||
|
Neethling et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2008 8:325 doi:10.1186/1471-2148-8-325 |
||
