|
Fitness data. |
|||||||||
| 1.000 |
0.976 |
0.708 |
0.975 |
0.981 |
0.984 |
0.995 |
0.978 |
0.564 |
0.593 |
| 0.976 |
0.990 |
0.973 |
0.990 |
0.982 |
0.718 |
0.500 |
|||
| 0.708 |
0.964 |
0.684 |
0.694 |
0.782 |
0.664 |
0.510 |
|||
| 0.975 |
0.983 |
0.975 |
0.974 |
0.977 |
0.650 |
0.482 |
|||
| 0.981 |
0.990 |
0.964 |
0.983 |
0.718 |
0.988 |
0.524 |
|||
| 0.984 |
0.973 |
0.684 |
0.975 |
0.724 |
0.986 |
0.490 |
|||
| 0.995 |
0.990 |
0.694 |
0.974 |
0.982 |
0.679 |
0.508 |
|||
| 0.978 |
0.982 |
0.782 |
0.977 |
0.718 |
0.724 |
0.982 |
|||
| 0.564 |
0.718 |
0.664 |
0.650 |
0.988 |
0.986 |
0.679 |
|||
| 0.593 |
0.500 |
0.510 |
0.482 |
0.524 |
0.490 |
0.508 |
|||
|
Each entry shows the fitness value of the corresponding genotype in Table 1. Fitness is reported as the median of ten replicate assays performed to estimate the growth-rate advantage of the respective mutant genotype relative to the wild-type strain [2]. Values above and below the diagonal are the same. Genotypes along the diagonal do not exist; other empty cells correspond to genotypes that are missing owing to the specific experimental design. | |||||||||
Beerenwinkel et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2007 7:60 doi:10.1186/1471-2148-7-60 |
|||||||||