|
Resolution: standard / high Figure 5.
Cumulative fitness gains measured and compared with two models. Test of the two model predictions shown in Figure 3 using cumulative ln-transformed fitness gains, as explained in the text. Error bars
are 95% confidence intervals. A: Cumulative gains predicted by the transitive model.
B: Cumulative gains observed over the four 5,000-generation intervals. C: Cumulative
gains predicted by the non-transitive model. Both the A and B confidence intervals
reciprocally overlap the A and B means, indicating that the prediction of the transitive
model is consistent with the independently measured cumulative gains. By contrast,
neither the B nor C confidence interval includes the reciprocal mean, and thus the
non-transitive model is strongly rejected by the data.
de Visser and Lenski BMC Evolutionary Biology 2002 2:19 doi:10.1186/1471-2148-2-19 |