Table 1 |
|||||||
GLMMs results for the proportion of successful matings and the total number of times mounting was scored per assay | |||||||
Sex | Trait | Distribution | Link function | Treatment | Size | Treatment × size | |
males | mated Y/N | Binary | Logit | F(1,258) | 0.02 | 0.01 | 4.32 |
P value | 0.8886 | 0.9113 | 0.0386 | ||||
total mounts | Neg Binomial | Log | F(1,258) | 7.38 | 1.85 | 12.17 | |
P value | 0.007 | 0.1753 | 0.0006 | ||||
females | mated Y/N | Binary | Logit | F(1,275) | 1.03 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
P value | 0.3111 | 0.915 | 0.9366 | ||||
total mounts | Neg Binomial | Log | F(1,275) | 5.3 | 1.46 | 2.47 | |
P value | 0.0221 | 0.2281 | 0.1174 |
Treatment refers to whether populations coevolved with N. whitei or not, and size refers to population size (i.e. small vs. large population size). The analysis was performed separately for males and females. Only fixed effects are shown; the random factor 'experimental population' never had a significant effect. Significant P-values are highlighted in bold.
Kerstes et al.
Kerstes et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2013 13:29 doi:10.1186/1471-2148-13-29