Table 1 |
|||||||
|
Significant likelihood ratio tests of selection on Sxl in Drosophila, the Tephritidae and M. domestica sequences |
|||||||
|
Test |
Line |
Alternative Ma |
Null Ma |
2ΔL |
df |
Pb |
Sitesc |
|
|
|||||||
|
1 |
a |
Nearly Neutral |
One ratio |
112.53 |
1 |
< 0.0001 |
21 |
|
2-D |
b |
Local selection |
Local relaxation |
9.16 |
1 |
0.0024 |
17 |
|
2-T |
c |
Local relaxation |
Uniform Selection |
262.18 |
2 |
< 0.0001 |
1 |
|
2-T |
d |
Local selection |
Local relaxation |
5.46 |
1 |
0.019 |
0 |
|
3-D |
e |
Local relaxation |
Uniform Selection |
248.25 |
2 |
< 0.0001 |
0 |
|
3-Rd |
f |
Local relaxation |
Uniform Selection |
208.30 |
2 |
< 0.0001 |
43 |
|
|
|||||||
|
a Alternative and null models, see Additional File 2, Table S1 for more information on models and Log-likelihood values, b P value calculated from a χ2 distribution, c number of sites significant in Bayesian post-hoc tests (P < 0.05), d clade consisting of all species excluding Drosophila. The alignment, after deleting gaps, was composed of 298 codons. Tests that we deemed weakly significant because Bayesian post-hoc tests did not detect relevant AA are shown in italics. |
|||||||
|
Mullon et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2012 12:5 doi:10.1186/1471-2148-12-5 |
|||||||