Table 2 |
||||
| Results for Mixed Effect models on Fitness components | ||||
| Size at birth | ||||
| F1 | Estimate | Std. error | DF | P |
| Fixed effect | ||||
| Intercept | −0.160 | 0.008 | 191 | <0.001 |
| Random effects | Std. Dev. | |||
| Tank (Intercept) | 0.068 | |||
| Residual | 0.044 | |||
| F2 | Estimate | Std. error | DF | P |
| Fixed effect | ||||
| Intercept | 0.859 | 0.006 | 262 | <0.001 |
| Random effects | Std. Dev. | |||
| Tank (Intercept) | 0.020 | |||
| Residual | 0.057 | |||
| Growth rate | ||||
| F1 | Estimate | Std. error | DF | P |
| Fixed effect | ||||
| Intercept | −2.192 | 0.024 | 190 | <0.001 |
| Random effects | Std. Dev. | |||
| Tank (Intercept) | 0.184 | |||
| Residual | 0.162 | |||
| F2 | Estimate | Std. error | DF | P |
| Fixed effect | ||||
| Intercept | −2.120 | 0.041 | 274 | <0.001 |
| Random effects | Std. Dev. | |||
| Tank (Intercept) | 0.204 | |||
| Residual | 0.190 | |||
| Time to sexual maturation | ||||
| F1 | ||||
| Fixed effect | Estimate | Std. error | DF | P |
| Intercept | 3.825 | 0.034 | 84 | <0.001 |
| Random effects | Std. Dev. | |||
| Tank (Intercept) | 0.253 | |||
| Residual | 0.130 | |||
| F2 | ||||
| Fixed effect | Estimate | Std. error | DF | P |
| Intercept | 3.720 | 0.027 | 242 | <0.001 |
| Random effects | Std. Dev. | |||
| Tank (Intercept) | 0.174 | |||
| Residual | 0.201 | |||
Effect of mating treatment on size at birth, growth rate and time to sexual maturation in F1s and F2s using linear mixed-effects models. Tank of origin was used as a random effect nested within mating treatment. Parameters are only shown for best-fitted model. Selection of best-fitted model and Akaike weights are shown in Additional file 2: Supporting Information 2.
Barbosa et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2012 12:185 doi:10.1186/1471-2148-12-185