Figure 4.

Plots of mtDNA uncorrected distance vs. ML patristic distance.A) Plot from a well-sampled Kikihia COI + COII mtDNA ingroup dataset containing 30 species [1]. B) Plot from the AmphipsaltaNotopsalta COI dataset from this study (light green dots), superimposed on the plot from A. The datasets span a nearly identical range of uncorrected distance values, but many corrected pairwise distances are over twice as large for AmphipsaltaNotopsalta at uncorrected distances > 6%. The trendline in B was fitted to the Kikihia data points under 4% uncorrected distance

Marshall et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2012 12:177   doi:10.1186/1471-2148-12-177
Download authors' original image