Table 2

Log-likelihood values and parameter estimates (ω, p, and n) for pro, rt and env in each twin.

Genes

LnLM1

LnLM2

ωM2

pM2

PSSM2

LnLM7

LnLM8

ωM8

pM8

PSSM8


Twin A

pro

-634.3

-634.3

1

0

0

-634.3

-634.2

1

0

0

rt

-1098

-1098

1

0

0

-1097.9

-1097.9

1

0

0

env

-3552.5

-3526.5

3.6

0.19

11

-3553.4

-3526.6

3.3

0.25

13


Twin B

pro

-666.7

-666.7

1

0

0

-666.7

-666.7

1

0

0

rt

-1444

-1441.8

5.8

0.02

1

-1444.1

-1441.7

5.4

0.02

1

env

-3040.5

-3039.4

1

0

0

-3041

-3039.4

1

0

0


LnL = Likelihood values; ω = estimate of dN/dS M2 and ωM8); p = proportion of sites under diversifying selection (pM2 and pM8); PSS = number of positively selected sites with a posterior probability > 0.95 (PSSM2 and PSSM8). All comparisons between nested models (M1 vs M2, and M7 vs M8) were significant.

Tazi et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2011 11:62   doi:10.1186/1471-2148-11-62

Open Data